Dzulkarnain Alghafuru Syahputra
Universitas Airlangga

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Policy In Forest Management For The Development Of The Capital City Of Nusantara Dzulkarnain Alghafuru Syahputra; Muklis Al'anam; Taufan Fajar Sasongko
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49612

Abstract

Pengembangan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) di Kalimantan Timur memiliki peran besar bagi pengelolaan hutan, mengingat wilayah tersebut didominasi oleh ekosistem hutan tropis dan bekas lokasi pertambangan. Kebijakan pengelolaan hutan dalam pengembangan IKN diarahkan untuk mewujudkan konsep kota hutan lestari, dengan target minimal 65–70% wilayahnya berupa ruang terbuka hijau. Nomor melalui kerangka hukum seperti Undang-Undang 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara, Undang-Undang Kehutanan, dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 63 Tahun 2022 tentang Rencana Induk IKN, pemerintah telah menegaskan kembali komitmennya terhadap konservasi, rehabilitasi lahan, perlindungan masyarakat adat, dan pengembangan ekonomi hijau. Namun, implementasi kebijakan hukum ini melawan tantangan, seperti tumpang tindih klaim lahan, potensi konflik kepentingan antara pembangunan dan konservasi, serta lemahnya pengawasan dan penegakan hukum lingkungan. Penelitian kebijakan hukum ini, yang didasarkan pada analisis normatif dengan pendekatan legislatif dan konseptual, menyimpulkan bahwa keberhasilan pengelolaan hutan dalam pembangunan IKN tidak hanya bergantung pada regulasi yang ada, tetapi juga pada implementasi yang konsisten, sinergi antarlembaga, dan keterlibatan aktif masyarakat lokal dan adat. Dengan demikian, kebijakan hukum pengelolaan hutan di IKN diharapkan dapat menjadi model pembangunan berkelanjutan yang menyeimbangkan kepentingan, ekonomi, dan sosial.
Reconceptualization of Marine Rights Granting: Decentralizing Permits, Deconcentrating Rights Determination Dzulkarnain Alghafuru Syahputra
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.52301

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 3/PUU-VIII/2010 abolished the Coastal Waters Cultivation Rights (HP-3) on the grounds that it contradicted the public trust doctrine. However, more than a decade after this decision, new forms of private control over marine spaces have emerged, including 263 Building Use Rights certificates and 4 Freehold Title certificates in Tangerang waters, as well as sea fences restricting access for traditional fishers. This normative-doctrinal legal research aimed to analyze the full decentralization design in Law No. 27 of 2007 concerning Management of Coastal Areas and Small Islands as a form of design error from the perspective of legislation formation. Using statute, conceptual, and case approaches, this research deconstructed the authority structure that conflates administrative and juridical functions, lacks vertical checks and balances, and ignores the character of the sea as public goods. The novelty of this research lies in offering a reconceptualization through the model of decentralization of permits and deconcentration of rights determination as an institutional firewall against conspirative practices. This research concluded that Law No. 1 of 2014 and the Job Creation Law only changed the nomenclature from "rights" to "permits" without fundamentally altering the defective authority structure. The proposed model separates location permits (administrative, temporary, decentralized to regional governments) from property rights determination (juridical, permanent, deconcentrated to central government apparatus in the regions), thereby creating vertical checks and balances while preserving legal certainty for investment and protecting the rights of local communities.