Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akta Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Umar Hasan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Integration Model of Malay Jambi Customary Law Values into the National Legal System for the Resolution of Customary Land Compensation Disputes Suhermi Suhermi; Herlina Manik; Umar Hasan; Diana Amir
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.48577

Abstract

Agrarian conflicts in Jambi Province, particularly those related to compensation for customary land (tanah ulayat), reveal the weak integration between customary law and positive law in protecting indigenous peoples’ rights. This study aims to analyze the implementation of compensation for customary land in Jambi and formulate a model of integrating Malay Jambi customary law values into the national legal system. The research employed a normative juridical method with conceptual and evaluative approaches, supported by secondary empirical data from civil society organizations such as WALHI, BRWA, and AMAN. The findings indicate that compensation practices in Jambi emphasize individual cash payments, disregarding the communal nature and spiritual dimensions of customary land. This situation is often exacerbated by the criminalization of indigenous communities in disputes with corporations, further weakening their bargaining position in conflict resolution. As a solution, this study proposes the HARMONI-ULAYAT Model, a framework for integrating the spiritual, social, participatory, and collective sovereignty values of Malay Jambi customary law into positive law. This model can take the form of local policies, administrative regulations, or hybrid tribunals to institutionalize adat-based conflict resolution. This article contributes to the development of agrarian and customary law studies and provides a reference for more responsive policies toward substantive justice.
LEGAL CERTAINTY OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION MEDIATION Sasmiar; Umar Hasan; Suhermi
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v14i1.33432

Abstract

If you look deeper into the substance of arbitration, the regulations are more dominant compared to the regulations regarding alternative dispute resolution. This arrangement is very important regarding the legal capacity of a mediator in carrying out his mediation function. Alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia is a tradition that has been implemented for a long time, such as in customary law in rural communities. An alternative model for resolving disputes in customary law communities is carried out by means of deliberation to reach a consensus. Dispute resolution through mediation is much more effective and efficient in terms of time, energy and costs when compared to dispute resolution through court. the process of resolving disputes through mediation is final and binding. The method used in this research is normative juridical. where doctrinal research is related to mediation within the framework of norms that have been abandoned or there is a legal vacuum. the rules regarding mediation are very simple while the legal requirements are increasing. the substance of the mediation arrangements is incomplete, such as arbitration. National legal product was regulated arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. in addition to being able to resolve civil disputes to general courts, there is also the possibility of submitting them through arbitration and alternative dispute resolution. laws arbitration and alternative dispute resolution such as mediation do not have legal certainty, because the substance of the mediation arrangements is incomplete.  This is certainly detrimental to the disputing parties. Supreme Court regulated vacuum law to control this legal proceeding. The mediation process is carried out based on the practices that apply in the field. This is certainly detrimental to the disputing parties, and reduces public interest in resolving their disputes through mediation Keywords: Dispute Resolution; Mediation; Legal Certainty
Co-Authors Diana Amir Herlina Manik Sasmiar Suhermi Suhermi Suhermi