Sitah S. Alshutwi
College of Nursing, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia | Ministry of the National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The relationship between leadership styles of nurse managers, nurse motivation, and turnover intention among nurses in Saudi Arabia: A descriptive correlational study Nouf Afit Aldhafeeri; Sitah S. Alshutwi; Ahoud Mofareh Alotaibi; Albandre Eid Alanaza; Amirah Hussain Jaber; Asrar Saleh Alharbi; Raghad Khalid Alowais
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): March - April
Publisher : Belitung Raya Publisher - Belitung Raya Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.4297

Abstract

Background: Nurses’ perceptions of their nurse managers’ leadership styles influence work motivation and turnover intention. However, limited evidence is available from Middle Eastern healthcare settings, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Objective: This study aimed to examine the relationships between nurse managers’ leadership styles, nurses’ work motivation, and turnover intention, and assessed whether work motivation moderates the association between leadership styles and turnover intention. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 377 nurses working in governmental hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January and March 2024. Leadership styles were measured across four dimensions: directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented leadership. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and multivariate linear regression, followed by moderation analysis. Results: The mean scores for supportive, participative, directive, and achievement-oriented leadership were 5.3 ± 1.0, 5.1 ± 1.0, 5.0 ± 1.0, and 4.9 ± 1.0, respectively. The mean scores for work motivation and turnover intention were 3.5 ± 0.9 and 3.1 ± 0.8. Correlation analysis indicated that all leadership styles were positively associated with work motivation, whereas only directive leadership was negatively associated with turnover intention. In multivariable regression analyses, after adjustment for sociodemographic and professional factors, achievement-oriented leadership remained significantly associated with higher work motivation (β = 0.51, p = 0.034), while directive leadership was independently and negatively associated with lower turnover intention (β = -0.15, p = 0.022). Nationality, educational level, years of experience, and working area were also significantly associated with turnover intention in adjusted models, while educational level and years of experience were associated with nurses’ perceptions of leadership styles. Moderation analysis showed that work motivation did not significantly moderate the relationship between directive leadership and turnover intention. Conclusion: Leadership styles were significantly associated with nurses’ work motivation and turnover intention. Achievement-oriented leadership was linked to higher work motivation, while directive leadership was associated with lower turnover intention. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening nurse managers’ leadership competencies to enhance nurses’ motivation and potentially reduce turnover intentions in hospital settings.