Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Theresia Anita Christiani
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Regulation Lawyers’ Ethics in Digital Litigation: Issues and Reforms on Access to Electronic Evidence Valentino Dodo Suharto; Cisa Eljosa; Theresia Anita Christiani
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i2.69

Abstract

The digitalization of Indonesia’s judiciary has generated new ethical challenges for the legal profession, particularly in relation to access and use of electronic evidence. Key concerns include potential breaches of data confidentiality, manipulation of digital evidence, and the absence of clear ethical standards governing advocates in e-court proceedings. Current procedural law and the advocates’ code of ethics do not adequately address the complexities of electronic evidence, which inevitably raise issues of privacy, cybersecurity, and procedural justice. This study aims to examine the ethical dilemmas faced by lawyers in digital litigation in Indonesia and to formulate both normative and institutional solutions to strengthen professional accountability. Employing normative legal research in statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, supported by case analysis involving evidence, the study highlights a regulatory gap in the advocates’ code of ethics and deficiencies in ethical oversight mechanisms. Missed leading in legal practices, especially in the electronic court, where everyone can access electronic evidence to support the need for regulation to protect electronic evidence in the electronic court. The findings suggest the need for reform through the incorporation of specific standards on electronic evidence within the code of ethics, enhancement of lawyers’ digital literacy, and establishment of technical guidelines by professional organizations and the Supreme Court.
Legal Settlement Mechanisms for the Use of Blank Checks as Collateral in Information Technology-Based Funding Service Agreements Eko Djoko Widiyatno; Theresia Anita Christiani; Apribilli Christiani
Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Contrarius Series: Law & Social Justice
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/cslsj.v1i2.137

Abstract

This study aims to examine the most effective dispute resolution strategies when the debtor issues a blank check as collateral in information technology-based funding service agreements. The concept of justice in this case encompasses both the concept of justice within the positivism paradigm and the concept of justice from the natural law perspective. This type of research is normative/doctrinal research. The research focuses on secondary data, which includes both primary and secondary legal materials. The data analysis technique uses qualitative data analysis. The conclusion-drawing technique uses deductive reasoning. Based on the results of this research, the dispute resolution method chosen in the event of a case involving the issuance of blank checks by debtors used as collateral in information technology-based financing agreements is a settlement method through the criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Apribilli Christiani Cisa Eljosa Eko Djoko Widiyatno Valentino Dodo Suharto