Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Mangrove Planting as an Effort to Prevent Abrasion on The Coast of The Pulau Ketam Kuala Perlis Forest Reserve Fitra Syawal Harahap; Hilwa Walida; Arman Harahap; Rahmadani Pane; Budianto Bangun; Agustina Nasution; Abdul Rauf; Sarifuddin Sarifuddin; Bernat Panjaitan
International Journal Of Community Service Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026 (Indonesia - Timor Leste)
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijcs.v6i1.905

Abstract

Abrasion can cause environmental damage, damage coastal infrastructure, and threaten the lives of communities living around the coast. One effort that can be made to prevent abrasion is planting mangroves along the coastal area. Mangrove forests are important habitats for marine organisms and act as coastal guards against abrasion. One area that has mangrove forests and is quite vulnerable to abrasion is Pulau Ketam Kuala Perlis. This activity aims to increase community awareness about the importance of mangroves in preventing abrasion, specifically in Pulau Ketam Kuala Perlis. The methods used include observation, interviews, and planting. The results of the Community Service Activity show that the community of understands and greatly benefits from mangrove planting efforts and abrasion prevention.  
Legal Analysis of the Judge's Decision on the Implementation of Article 93 Paragraph 1 Based on Law No. 45 of 2009 Concerning Fisheries (Decision Study No. 317/Pid.Sus/2013/PU. RHL) Henryco Siahaan; Ahmad Ansyari Siregar; Nimrot Siahaan; Bernat Panjaitan
International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijse.v6i1.289

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of Article 93 paragraph (1) of Law No. 45 of 2009 concerning Fisheries in Decision No. 317/Pid.Sus/2013/PN.RHL. The focus of the study is on proving the elements of the crime, the suitability of the evidence used, and the judge's legal considerations in issuing the decision. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The results of the study indicate that all elements of the crime regulated in Article 93 paragraph (1) have been fulfilled through valid evidence based on Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge in this case is considered to have applied the provisions of the article appropriately, both in terms of evidence and legal considerations. However, the decision still has weaknesses in terms of strengthening ecological aspects and deterrent effects on perpetrators of fisheries crimes. Therefore, a more comprehensive legal approach is needed that not only provides criminal sanctions, but also considers environmental losses and the need for sustainable protection of marine resources.