Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Iyus YL Tobing
Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Harmonisasi Pengujian Peraturan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Konstitusional Adhe Permana; Rendhi Renaldhi; Siti Nur Ambarini; Iyus YL Tobing; Ihsan Sanjaya; Sena Narenda; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10289

Abstract

The division of authority for judicial review of regulations between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) often leads to overlapping jurisdiction, differing standards of review, and inconsistent rulings. This situation weakens legal certainty and constitutional protection, which should form the foundation of a rule of law state. This research analyzes the source of this disharmony using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The study's findings indicate the absence of an integrative mechanism between the two institutions to ensure the alignment of review parameters. Therefore, a harmonization model is required to clearly define the boundaries of authority, synchronize the standards of review, and strengthen the coordination of rulings. This harmonization is projected to enhance the effectiveness of constitutional control and guarantee the protection of citizens' rights more consistently.
KUHP dan KUHAP Perdebatan Hukum, Kebebasan Sipil, dan Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Peninjauan Judicial Review Siti Nur Ambarini; Masharin Masharin; Iyus YL Tobing; Arif Hardiyanto; Adzan Dylan Caesarrio; Firman Adi Candra
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i2.11309

Abstract

This article examines the ongoing legal debates surrounding Indonesia's Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), focusing on their implications for civil liberties and the pivotal role of the Constitutional Court in judicial review processes. The recent revisions to the KUHP have sparked significant public discourse, raising concerns about potential infringements on fundamental rights, particularly freedom of expression and assembly. Simultaneously, the KUHAP, as the procedural framework, governs the implementation of criminal law and its impact on the rights of the accused. This research aims to analyze the contested provisions within both codes, explore the arguments put forth by various stakeholders, and critically assess the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence in adjudicating challenges to these laws. Employing a normative legal research methodology, the study will delve into statutory interpretations, legal theories, and comparative legal perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal complexities. The findings will highlight the delicate balance between maintaining public order, upholding human rights, and ensuring the rule of law in a democratic society. Ultimately, this article seeks to contribute to the ongoing scholarly discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and offer insights into the future direction of its criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Adhe Permana Adzan Dylan Caesarrio Arif Hardiyanto Firman Adi Candra Ihsan Sanjaya Masharin Masharin Rendhi Renaldhi Sena Narenda Siti Nur Ambarini