Luter Girsang
PUI Human Resource Management Research and Innovation Centre, Universitas Prima Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Public Challenges and Employee Performance: An Analysis of the Roles of Organizational Adaptation and Human Resource Management Innovation at the Medan City Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BKAD) Chatrin Amelia Gurusinga; Jhon Sehatdo Natanael Saragih; Muhammad Permana Yoga; Luter Girsang
MAR-Ekonomi: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi (MAR-Ekonomi), 2026
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study seeks to examine the impact of public problems, organisational adaptation, and innovations in HR management on employee performance within the BKAD of the Medan Mayor's Office. This research employs a quantitative methodology including a sample of 94 employees. The sampling technique employs saturated samples, utilising the entire population as the sample. Data acquisition was conducted by interviews, surveys, and documentation. The employed analytical approaches comprised validity testing, reliability testing, classical assumption testing, multiple linear regression analysis, coefficient of determination, t-test, and F-test. The findings indicated that societal challenges positively and significantly influenced employee performance, with a significance value of 0.029. Additionally, organisational adaptation positively and significantly affected performance, with a significance value of 0.000, while HR management innovation also had a positive and significant effect, with a significance value of 0.000. Concurrently, public issues, organisational adaptation, and innovations in HR management exert a positive and strong influence on employee performance, evidenced by an Fcal value of 62.033, surpassing the Ftable of 2.710. The adjusted R-squared value of 0.663 signifies that 66.3% of the variance in employee performance is attributable to the three independent variables, and the remaining 33.7% is accounted for by external factors not included in the study. The research findings indicate that public problems, organisational adaptation, and innovation in human resource management positively and significantly impact employee performance at the BKAD of the Medan Mayor's Office.
The Effect of Work-Life Balance, Work Motivation, and Work Environment on Employee Performance in Medan Petisah Ini Rahura Harahap; Christi Zepanya Elisabeth Limbong; Friscila Septriyani Hutabarat; Luter Girsang
MAR-Ekonomi: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi (MAR-Ekonomi), 2026
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Finding out how factors like work-life balance, intrinsic motivation, and the physical workplace affect productivity in Medan Petisah is the primary goal of this research. Research of this kind relies on quantitative methods. Roughly ninety-seven people participated in the study. Multiple linear regression analysis was the technique utilized to analyze the data. According to the t-test results, work-life balance significantly impacts workforce performance (t = 4.959> t table = 1.985, p < 0.05), work motivation significantly impacts workforce performance (t = 5.461> t table = 1.985, p < 0.05), and the work environment significantly impacts workforce performance (t = 6.418> t table = 1.985, p < 0.05). The findings of the F hypothesis test indicate that work motivation, work life balance, and work environment all impact workforce performance. This is supported by a significance value of 0.000<0.05 and a F count value of 61.542> F table 2.703. Coefficient of determination analysis shows that work-life balance, motivation, and work environment all have an impact on workforce performance (with an adjusted R-squared value of 0.654), accounting for 65.4% of the total. Other variables not included in this study accounted for 34.6% of the total influence.