Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Private and Commercial Law Sangia Nibandera Law Research
Sergi Fernandez Alejandro
Sociedad Civil de Derecho y Políticas Públicas (SOCIPOL)
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
United States Veto Power and Its Legal Implications for Palestinian Statehood Shofiah Nur Hikmah; Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono; Sergi Fernandez Alejandro
Sangia Nibandera Law Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Sangia Nibandera Law Research, December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19653580

Abstract

This study examines the use of the veto power by the United States within the United Nations Security Council and its impact on resolutions concerning the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Since 1972, the United States has exercised its veto 86 times, including 49 instances in which resolutions critical of Israel or calling for ceasefires were blocked. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this paper analyzes both the regulatory framework governing veto use and its practical application in this context. The findings indicate that the United States’ use of the veto reflects its strategic political interests and has significant implications for the dynamics of the conflict. In particular, the repeated exercise of this power has contributed to diplomatic stagnation, heightened regional tensions, and diminished the effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council in addressing conflicts in the Middle East. Furthermore, the study highlights the long-term consequences of United States foreign policy for Palestinian self-determination and underscores the structural challenges faced by the international community in pursuing an equitable and sustainable resolution. This research contributes to ongoing debates on the role of great power influence within multilateral institutions and emphasizes the need for institutional reforms to promote greater fairness, accountability, and effectiveness in global governance.
The Broken Bridge: Are Religious Courts Upholding the Promise of Post-Divorce Support for Women and Children in Indonesia? Ahsanul Fahmi; Arlo Benjamin Scott; Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali; Sergi Fernandez Alejandro
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v9i2.34530

Abstract

Women and children occupy a distinct and vulnerable position within the Indonesian legal system, particularly in post-divorce situations. Although statutory provisions and Supreme Court regulations establish a normative foundation for protecting their rights, implementation remains inconsistent across judicial practices. This study examines the evolving role of the Religious Courts in ensuring the fulfillment of women’s and children’s rights after divorce. Using a normative juridical method with statute and conceptual approaches, the research explores the gap between legal norms and enforcement. Findings reveal that despite the limited number of divorce rulings explicitly addressing alimony, the Supreme Court has initiated significant reforms through Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA), strengthening judicial authority to defend vulnerable parties. Furthermore, innovative practices observed in the Religious Courts of Surabaya, Gresik, Bengkulu, and Bontang—such as salary deductions, digital monitoring systems, and inter-agency collaboration—demonstrate effective institutional interconnection in enforcing alimony. The novelty of this research lies in identifying an emergent model of cross-sectoral collaboration within the judiciary that bridges normative law and practical enforcement. Its primary contribution extends beyond the Indonesian context by offering an applicable framework for other jurisdictions facing similar challenges in the protection of women and children’s post-divorce rights. This study underscores that institutional synergy and digital governance can serve as globally relevant strategies for achieving sustainable legal protection and advancing social justice.
Co-Authors Ahsanul Fahmi Arlo Benjamin Scott Shofiah Nur Hikmah Sonny Saptoajie Wicaksono Souad Ahmed Ezzerouali