Riris Cahaya Andini
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Klausul Pengesampingan Pasal 1813 KUHPerdata dalam Akta Notaris: Kajian Terhadap Kuasa Mutlak Dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Rolland Victor Silubun; Nurul Fatwa Ali; Riris Cahaya Andini
CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/cendekia.v6i3.9808

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the existence, legal validity, and consequences of clauses that waive Article 1813 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) within Notarial deeds, commonly known as absolute power of attorney. In business and property transactions, this waiver is frequently utilized to create irrevocable powers of attorney based on the principle of freedom of contract under Article 1338. However, in the agrarian sector, this practice faces stringent statutory prohibitions. This research employs a normative juridical method with a conceptual and statutory approach, utilizing secondary legal sources. The findings indicate that while Article 1813 generally functions as optional law (regelend recht), its waiver for land rights transfers is strictly prohibited by Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 14 of 1982. The inclusion of such a waiver clause violates the lawful cause requirement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, rendering the entire binding sale and purchase agreement (PPJB) null and void. Consequently, the authentic deed loses its perfect evidentiary weight and becomes legally flawed. Notaries who formulate such clauses are subject to civil liability under professional fault (beroepsfout) or tort (onrechtmatige daad). The study implies that Notaries must independently refuse to draft deeds containing absolute power clauses to protect economically weaker parties and maintain professional integrity.
Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Baru Ditjen AHU Terkait Dokumen Tambahan dalam Pendaftaran Perubahan Yayasan oleh Notaris Riris Cahaya Andini; Lutfia Brillian Arysa Mungky; Nisa Almadina
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i4.9805

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the new policy of the Directorate General of General Legal Administration (Ditjen AHU) regarding the requirements for additional documents in the registration of changes in foundation data by notaries. The background of this study was triggered by an administrative renewal of the system aimed at tightening institutional verification and preventing internal disputes of the foundation, which in turn put a new burden of obligation on notaries as public officials. Using normative legal research methods through legislative approaches and conceptual approaches, this study examines secondary legal materials that include ministerial regulations and related circulars. Research results show that the obligation to upload additional documents, such as affidavits not in dispute and corporate account renewal, changes standard procedures on the online AHU system. Although this policy succeeded in increasing the validity of the data and strengthening legal certainty, this new regulation also added bureaucracy and shifted the burden of substantive verification more heavily to notaries. The implications of this study confirmed the need for the Ministry of Law to balance between the firmness of administrative supervision and the efficiency of the system, to ensure that electronic portals remain accommodating while minimizing the risk of office responsibility for notaries.