Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

CASASTROPIC; LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINTS CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA Firmansyah; Miftah Idris
MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Maddika: Journal Of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : UIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/maddika.v6i2.10314

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to provide solutions in law enforcement against corruption in Indonesia that occurs massively and damages the state order and by examining the aspects of law enforcement carried out to eradicate corruption crimes.This study uses a type of normative research with a conceptual approach. The collection method used is library research technique by identifying journals or writings related to corruption in Indonesia, integrating the theory of the L.W. Friedman legal system and the prophetic theory of kuntowijoyo to describe the chronic causes faced in law enforcement against corruption and find solutions in handling corruption in Indonesia. The results of the research, it can be seen from L.W. Friedman's approach to legal system theory; substance, structure and culture, where in this analysis the substance and structure are analyzed in an integrated manner by emphasizing the rules by focusing on the emergence of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission related to the existence of the Corruption Eradication Commission and also the urgency of reverse proof in corruption cases and culturally refers to the problem of morality, where there are law enforcement personnel who are against the law themselves while in other contexts with offers solutions that highlight the prophetic theory of Kuntowijoyo by integrating it into the analysis in this paper which consists of; Transedental (ethical-spiritual values), humanization (humanizing human beings) that reject dehumanization or reject corruption is associated with deviations and abuse of power and liberation, namely liberating from pressure and intimidation, one of which is corruption. Keywords: Corruption, Law Enforcement, casastropic
English: English Miftah Idris; Danang Wahyu Muhammad
Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/alw.v10i2.8659

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze the evolution of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in resolving sharia insurance disputes in Indonesia, as well as to identify global research trends, allocations for scientific investigation, and practical implications. This study not only maps these developments but also provides a structured understanding of the conceptual and procedural evolution of ADR. This contribution offers researchers, policymakers, and practitioners a clearer foundation for improving dispute resolution mechanisms in the sharia insurance sector. Method – The research employs normative legal methodology, incorporating a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and bibliometric analysis. This approach involved the selection of 16 articles from the Scopus database, utilizing VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software to map scientific advancements and interconnections among research topics. Result – The findings demonstrate a notable rise in publications related to ADR and insurance since 2020, with a primary focus on mediation mechanisms, arbitration, ex gratia, sharia dispute resolution, and the integration of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The research identified the necessity for regulatory reform of the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK) and the establishment of a hybrid ADR-ODR model to enhance fairness, efficiency, and legal certainty within the insurance industry Implication – These findings enhance the understanding of how ADR innovations can tackle systemic challenges in sharia insurance dispute resolution and contribute evidence-based recommendations for legal and institutional reform.