Rifanto Bin Ridwan
Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Drug Abuse as a Ground for Divorce from the Perspective of Maqashid Syariah Handika Utama Putra; Busman Edyar; Ilda Hayati; Rifanto Bin Ridwan
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i3.3569

Abstract

This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of drug abuse as a triggering factor of divorce in Rejang Lebong Regency and to evaluate it through the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. The research employs a case study design with a sequential explanatory approach, integrating quantitative data obtained from the Religious Court of Curup with in-depth interviews involving divorced parties, customary leaders, and legal practitioners. The findings reveal two major conclusions. First, on an empirical level, drug abuse in Rejang Lebong has been identified as a systemic problem strongly associated with 15–30% of divorce petitions filed at the Religious Court of Curup over the past two years. Second, from the perspective of Maqasid Sharia, drug abuse systematically undermines the five universal objectives of Islamic law. It damages the intellect (hifzh al-‘aql) as the center of human consciousness, endangers life (hifzh al-nafs) through health risks and mortality, threatens lineage (hifzh al-nasl) by fostering an unhealthy family environment, and destroys property (hifzh al-mal) through financial waste on narcotics consumption. Accordingly, Islam views divorce in such circumstances not merely as a legal remedy, but as a necessary measure to safeguard greater public interest (maslahah), particularly the protection of life and the future of children, especially when the fundamental objectives of marriage tranquility and affection have been severely undermined. In this sense, divorce becomes a last-resort but legitimate mechanism to preserve the higher purposes of Sharia.
Implementation of Restorative Justice in Resolving Domestic Violence Cases from the Perspective of Islamic Family Law (Mediation Study at the Lebong Police) Pakhrizal Hakim; Rifanto Bin Ridwan; Hendriyanto Hendriyanto
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i3.3570

Abstract

The implementation of restorative justice in resolving domestic violence (Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga/KDRT) cases at the Lebong Resort Police has emerged as a significant issue within Indonesia’s contemporary law enforcement system. This approach provides an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution outside formal litigation by prioritizing reconciliation and the restoration of relationships between victims and perpetrators. Nevertheless, its application in domestic violence cases, which are categorized as absolute complaint offenses, raises important legal and ethical questions when examined through the lens of Islamic family law. Accordingly, this study seeks to analyze the practice of restorative justice at Polres Lebong and to evaluate its implementation from the perspective of Islamic family law. The research employs an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. Primary data were collected through in-depth interviews involving investigators from the Women and Children Protection Unit (Unit PPA) of Polres Lebong, victims, perpetrators, religious leaders, and community figures. In addition, secondary data were obtained from statutory regulations, academic books, and scholarly journal articles relevant to restorative justice and domestic violence issues. The findings reveal that the restorative justice process at Polres Lebong is primarily carried out through mediation involving the perpetrator, the victim, family members, and police officers. The process requires several essential conditions, including the perpetrator’s acknowledgment of wrongdoing, the victim’s willingness to forgive, and the formulation of a written peace agreement between the parties. From the standpoint of Islamic family law, this practice is closely aligned with the principle of iṣlāḥ (reconciliation), as reflected in QS An-Nisaʾ verse 35. The involvement of family representatives and community leaders in the mediation process also corresponds to the Islamic concept of appointing hakam (mediators) to resolve family disputes. Furthermore, agreements concerning compensation or financial support embody the Islamic values of justice (‘adālah) and responsibility (mas’ūliyyah). Even so, the implementation of restorative justice must continue to prioritize victim protection and ensure that reconciliation efforts do not compromise victims’ rights or create opportunities for repeated violence in the future.