Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan OJK Sebagai Penyidik Tunggal  pada Sektor Keuangan Berdasarkan UU P2SK Fadila Nur Febriyandari; Nynda Fatmawati Octarina
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/w80d8q89

Abstract

The appointment of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) as the sole investigator in the financial sector represents a strategic step in strengthening law enforcement and regulatory oversight of financial services in Indonesia. This authority is granted under Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (UU PPSK), which authorizes OJK to conduct criminal investigations related to financial sector offenses. This study aims to analyze the legal foundation, relevance, and juridical implications of such investigative powers in relation to the rule of law and the Indonesian criminal justice system. Using a normative legal research method and statutory approach, the study finds that granting OJK exclusive investigative powers is a form of institutional reform intended to address enforcement fragmentation. However, it also raises challenges in terms of accountability, procedural safeguards, and institutional coordination with other law enforcement bodies such as the police and the prosecutor’s office. Therefore, further regulation and robust external oversight are essential to ensure that this authority is exercised in accordance with the principles of a state governed by law.
Tindakan Fraud dalam Hal Rekayasa Kredit  oleh Pegawai Bank dalam Transaksi Perbankan Dikaitkan dengan Prinsip Kehati- Hatian  (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 171/PID.SUS-TPK/2022/PN SBY Nynda Fatmawati Octarina; Fadila Nur Febriyandari
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/b5zppt68

Abstract

This study focuses on the application of the banking prudential principle regarding bank employees acting as credit initiators. Credit disbursement procedures rely on the authority of both the credit initiator and the credit approver. The study examines the corruption case registered as Number 171/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/PN.Sby. Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking mandates that all bank employees must apply the prudential principle in banking transactions. The case chronology reveals that the defendant engaged in fraudulent activity by orchestrating the disbursement of fictitious customer loans in collusion with other parties for personal gain. The research addresses two issues: first, the application of the prudential principle by the credit initiator in their capacity as the credit processor; and second, an analysis of the involvement of the credit initiator and the credit approver based on the court ruling, alongside an analysis of the fraudulent actions. This study employs statutory, conceptual, and case study research approaches.