Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Contrarius
Amir Firmansyah
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Adhyaksa, Jakarta
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Reframing State Loss Policy in Price-Related Corruption Cases: A Future Agenda Amir Firmansyah; Mohammad Abdallah Alshawabke; Suzali Sulaiman; Jan Alizea Sybelle
Contrarius Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Contrarius
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/contrarius.v2i2.274

Abstract

State losses from corruption cases in Indonesia are commonly interpreted solely as financial losses, while broader economic losses are largely overlooked. Corruption generates impacts that extend beyond fiscal depletion, affecting economic stability, social welfare, ecological integrity, and other systemic dimensions. This study therefore aims, first, to identify and examine the challenges arising from the ambiguous definition of state loss in Indonesia’s legal framework, particularly in price-related corruption cases; second, to analyse Singapore’s conduct-based model of corruption enforcement, which does not treat state loss as an element of the offence; and third, to formulate an ideal normative framework that can strengthen Indonesia’s anti-corruption regime. Using a normative legal research method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the ambiguity of the state-loss concept has made it difficult to establish economic losses in court, leading judges to focus exclusively on financial loss and leaving broader economic harm unaddressed in judicial decisions. In contrast, Singapore’s approach, by excluding state loss as an element of corruption, allows enforcement to centre on gratification and corrupt intent, resulting in a more coherent and efficient process than the Indonesian model. Consequently, a reframing of the state-loss concept is required, including more precise parameters of economic loss within anti-corruption law, standardised methodologies for its calculation, and broader asset-recovery mechanisms to enhance legal certainty and improve the overall effectiveness of corruption enforcement.
Good University Governance and Its Role in Reaching Quality Education SDGs Amir Firmansyah; Zul Karnen; Suparji Suparji; Aris Machmud
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v4i1.288

Abstract

This study examines the increasing demands of globalization by asserting that higher education institutions must develop governance systems that operate effectively and ensure accountability. It argues that the implementation of Good University Governance functions as a strategic instrument to reinforce transparency, accountability, and participatory management within higher education institutions. The study investigates whether such implementation can significantly enhance educational quality in accordance with sustainable development objectives. Employing a normative legal research method, this research applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, including a comparison with governance practices in Malaysia and Singapore. The findings demonstrate that first, the implementation of Good University Governance substantially improves the quality of university governance by promoting institutional transparency, accountability, and responsiveness to societal needs. Second, higher education institutions encounter persistent challenges in implementing Good University Governance, particularly in relation to inadequate infrastructure, limited human resource capacity, regulatory inconsistency, and weak monitoring and transparency mechanisms. Third, the study formulates legal strategies that prioritize regulatory strengthening, effective supervision, protection of stakeholder rights, and the integration of technology to establish adaptive, transparent, and accountable governance systems that support the realization of quality education within the framework of sustainable development.
Co-Authors Aris Machmud Jan Alizea Sybelle Mohammad Abdallah Alshawabke Suparji Suparji Suzali Sulaiman Zul Karnen