Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Talenta Sipil
Dwitya Okky Azanna
Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Batanghari, Kota Jambi-36122, Indonesia
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pondasi Tiang Pancang Pipa Baja Jembatan Parit 3 Kec. Kuala Jambi Muhamad Ardy Pratama; Suhendra Suhendra; Dwitya Okky Azanna; Amsori M. Das; Wari Dony; Fadlan Fadlan
Jurnal Talenta Sipil Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/talentasipil.v9i2.1423

Abstract

Steel pipe pile foundations function to transfer superstructure loads to the supporting soil layer while providing resistance to axial and lateral forces. These foundations are widely used not only for buildings but also for various civil engineering structures, including bridges. The Parit 3 Bridge in Kuala Jambi District was constructed to reconnect two disconnected road sections, thereby improving local community accessibility. This study aimed to analyze the bridge structural loading and determine the bearing capacity of the steel pipe pile foundation using the Schmertmann and Nottingham method. Bridge loading calculations were performed in accordance with SNI 1725:2016, while the foundation bearing capacity was evaluated using the Schmertmann and Nottingham method. The results indicated that the maximum factored ultimate load under the Strength 1 load combination was Pu = 3,695.00 kN, equivalent to 376.79 tons. The allowable bearing capacity of a single pile was Qa = 739.538 kN, equivalent to 75.411 tons, whereas the bearing capacity of the pile group was Qg = 7,395.380 kN, equivalent to 751.841 tons. The calculated pile group bearing capacity exceeded the maximum applied load, indicating that the foundation satisfied the required bearing capacity criteria. Furthermore, both the single-pile settlement and the pile-group settlement were smaller than the allowable settlement, demonstrating that the settlement requirements were also satisfied.
Analisis Percepatan Waktu Menggunakan Metode Crashing dengan Penambahan Jam Kerja Tiga Jam dan Sistem Shift Aulia Sivani; Elvira Handayani; Dwitya Okky Azanna; Annisaa Dwiretnani; Riki Saputra; Rioni Rizki Aldiansyah
Jurnal Talenta Sipil Vol 9, No 2 (2026): Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/talentasipil.v9i2.1225

Abstract

During the construction process of a project, many unexpected events can occur, one of which is project delays. These delays may result from various factors such as unfavorable weather conditions, design changes, planning errors, and several others. Therefore, it is necessary to consider alternative strategies to support project acceleration. These alternatives may include extending working hours, using more productive equipment, increasing the number of workers, utilizing materials that are quicker to install, and implementing faster construction methods. This study analyzes the acceleration of project completion time in the construction project of SMPN 3 using the crashing method, with two alternatives: extending working hours by three hours and implementing a shift system. The objective of this research is to determine the total project duration after applying crashing with the two alternatives and to identify which critical path activities were accelerated in the SMPN 3 construction project. Based on the analysis, the total project duration after crashing using the three-hour extended workday alternative is 175 days, representing a time savings of approximately 20% compared to the normal duration of 218 days. Meanwhile, the total project duration after crashing using the shift system alternative is 109 days, resulting in a time savings of approximately 50% from the original duration of 218 days.
Co-Authors Amsori M. Das Annisaa Dwiretnani Aulia Sivani Elvira Handayani Fadlan Fadlan Muhamad Ardy Pratama Riki Saputra Rioni Rizki Aldiansyah Suhendra Suhendra Wari Dony