Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Agus Rasyid C W
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Investigators Authority and Accountability in Pursuing Wanted Persons in Narcotics Cases: A Normative Juridical Analysis of the West Java Regional Widri Sukandi; Agus Rasyid C W
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v3i2.301

Abstract

This article examines the authority and accountability of investigators in pursuing individuals listed as wanted persons (Wanted Persons List) in narcotics cases handled by the West Java Regional Police. The study employs a normative juridical method supported by statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to evaluate the relationship between coercive investigative powers, procedural legality, and the protection of due process rights. The findings indicate that investigators’ authority originates from statutory attribution under narcotics legislation and criminal procedural law and is exercised through delegation and mandates within the police organizational structure. Nevertheless, the pursuit and arrest of wanted persons must remain subject to legal certainty, administrative accuracy, proportionality, and respect for human rights. Investigators are required to issue valid summonses, maintain complete investigative records, verify the status of individuals listed in the Wanted Persons List, document arrest procedures, apply force only when necessary and proportionate, and obtain judicial authorization for searches, seizures, or asset-related measures. The study concludes that layered internal, judicial, and public accountability mechanisms are necessary to prevent misuse of authority, strengthen professional responsibility, protect suspects’ rights, and ensure that narcotics law enforcement remains effective, transparent, and consistent with the principles of the rule of law.
Bhabinkamtibmas Problem-Solving Authority in Student Dispute Resolution in Bandung Wetan: A Juridical Analysis Based on Restorative Justice Mardiono Mardiono; Agus Rasyid C W
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v3i2.304

Abstract

This article examines the legal authority of Bhabinkamtibmas in resolving student disputes in Bandung Wetan through a problem-solving approach. The study employs normative juridical legal research supported by statutory, conceptual, case, and analytical approaches. The findings indicate that Bhabinkamtibmas possesses a legitimate legal basis to facilitate the settlement of community disputes under the Indonesian Constitution, Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, the 2015 Regulation on Community Policing, and the 2021 Police Regulation on Restorative Justice. In the context of student disputes, the problem-solving mechanism reflects the principles of restorative justice because it prioritizes dialogue, voluntary participation, social restoration, personal responsibility, deliberation, and social reintegration. This approach also seeks to prevent escalation, maintain public order, and rebuild relationships among the parties involved. However, its implementation still encounters several legal weaknesses, particularly the absence of specific regulations governing student disputes and the lack of uniform operational standards for field officers. Therefore, this article proposes a collaborative dispute-resolution model involving Bhabinkamtibmas, universities, students, and local communities. It may also improve public trust in community-based policing practices. Such collaboration is expected to strengthen legal certainty, fairness, accountability, institutional coordination, and the sustainability of dispute settlement in academic and community environments.
Co-Authors Mardiono Mardiono Widri Sukandi