Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries Ali Masyhar; Rohadhatul Aisy; Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna; Gaini Mukhanova
BESTUUR Vol 12, No 1 (2024): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v12i1.78576

Abstract

Indonesia continues to experience recidivist terrorism regularly as a result of the injustices it faces. As a result, it is critical to prioritize the legitimacy of social justice for both victims and perpetrators, as well as adopt a humanitarian approach to non-criminal terrorism to mitigate and avert criminal acts of terrorism. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of social justice in counterterrorism environments. This research employs normative juridical research to compare the counterterrorism regulations of several countries that incorporate social justice legitimacy. The findings of this research show that, first, it is crucial to integrate procedural justice and legitimacy principles into counterterrorism initiatives to preserve public confidence in the justice system, prevent exploitation, and uphold human rights. Second, it is critical to compare other countries' terrorism regulations to understand and evaluate their strategies for enhancing international cooperation and preventing terrorist attacks. In response to persistent terrorist threats, the United Kingdom, Pakistan, and the European Union implemented more ambitious counterterrorism strategies and incorporated social justice into their policies. To achieve effective and socially just terrorism regulations, Indonesia must adopt regulations in these countries.
Designing a Human–AI Collaborative Blended Learning Framework for EFL Speaking Development Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna; Karimjonova Shakhlo Ravshanjonovna; Muhammadjon Zokirjon o‘g‘li Solijonov; Aziza Akhmedova Komilovna; Po’latova Irodakhon Ilxomjon qizi; Jurayeva Nargiza Jamolidinovna
Jurnal Arbitrer Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ar.13.3.374-389.2026

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as conversational chatbots and speech recognition systems are increasingly adopted in language education, existing research focuses predominantly on isolated tools rather than integrated instructional models. This study proposes and evaluates a Human–AI Collaborative Blended Learning Framework for the development of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speaking skills. Using a two-phase research design, the study first synthesizes contemporary literature to establish a 7-layer conceptual framework that connects stakeholder participation, learner profiling, a Human–AI collaboration engine, blended activities, adaptive speaking services, teacher facilitation, and continuous learning analytics. Second, the framework was evaluated through an expert validation survey involving 52 specialists in language education, applied linguistics, and educational technology (40.4% PhDs, 57.7% Master’s). Quantitative findings revealed strong endorsement for actionable teacher support dashboards (80.8% agreement), visual pronunciation feedback (78.8%), and private AI speaking practice for anxiety reduction (75.0%; M = 2.98/4.00). However, experts expressed reservations regarding automated prompts for language elaboration (53.8% agreement), fixed 14-meeting schedules (57.7%), and automated grading weights (57.7%). Qualitative analysis highlighted that acceptance remains conditional upon accent fairness, data privacy, and active teacher oversight. Implications: Theoretically, the study advances AI-assisted language learning by establishing a human-centered collaborative model that prioritizes teacher-AI shared regulation over technological substitution. Pedagogically and practically, the findings imply that institutions and EdTech developers should deploy AI primarily for scalable, low-stakes rehearsal and actionable lesson planning, while preserving teacher authority over social communication, pragmatic competence, and high-stakes assessment.