Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Optimalisasi Pelayanan Administrasi Balik Nama Sertifikat Tanah Guna Efisiensi Tata Kelola Pertanahan yang Berkepastian Hukum (Studi Kasus di Desa Ngombakan, Kecamatan Polokarto, Kabupaten Sukoharjo) Salsabila Anggraini Zakaria; Sri Sumartiningsih; Sumidi S
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17689392

Abstract

This research examined is the effectiveness of administrative services in the land certificate transfer process in Ngombakan Village, Polokarto District, Sukoharjo Regency. The study was conducted using a normative juridical approach supported by empirical data. Analysis of legal provisions indicates that the transfer mechanism is regulated by Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration, which emphasize the principle of legal certainty through land rights registration. The findings indicate the need to optimize administrative services in Ngombakan Village by strengthening the role of the village government as a facilitator, providing simple digital guides, and improving community legal literacy.
PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY REGARDING THE AUTHORITY TO WIRETAP BY THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE BASED ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED APPROACH Salsabila Anggraini Zakaria; Eko Mukminto Mukminto
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 5 (2026): Special Edition Part 1
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i5.47920

Abstract

This article examines the legal basis of prosecutorial interception authority and its alignment with the protection of the right to privacy through a Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA). Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study evaluates the interception provisions in the Prosecutor’s Law and sectoral regulations. The findings indicate that prosecutorial interception remains declarative and lacks operational procedures that meet the HRBA principles of legality, necessity, proportionality, and accountability. This gap poses privacy risks and highlights the urgency of enacting a comprehensive Interception Act to ensure accountable and rights-compliant implementation.