p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Privat Law
Adi Sulistiyono
Penulis Korespondensi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN MEREK TERKENAL MENJADI MEREK GENERIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 Reni Eka Septianingrum; Adi Sulistiyono
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-JUNI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i1.50363

Abstract

This articles aim to determine the legal protection of well-known trademark into generic trademark in the Intellectual Property Law system in Indonesia. This writing is a normative legal research with prescriptive research characteristics. Legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials that are collected by using literature study techniques. The author in conducting this research uses a statutory approach, a case approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. Based on the results of the discussion, it was concluded that a well-known registered mark that proved to be transformed into a generic brand would lose its distinguishing power, so that such a brand has weak legal protection and has the potential to face a lawsuit for cancellation. However, under certain conditions, there are marks that are indicated to have changed to become generic and still receive legal protection and remain registered, provided that the mark is able to build secondary meaning by public understanding.Generic Trademark; Legal Protection; Wellknown Trademark 
PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM ACARA PERDATA MELALUI GUGATAN SEDERHANA GUNA MENINGKATKAN KEMUDAHAN BERUSAHA DI INDONESIA Wiwin Dwi Ratna Febriyanti; Adi Sulistiyono
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-JUNI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v12i1.85624

Abstract

AbstractBusiness dispute resolution plays a crucial role in the legal and economic development of a country. Investors will try to invest when the conduciveness of a country shows its role. One of the benchmarks for the ease of investors entering Indonesia includes 10 indicators as stated by the World Bank in its survey. For this reason, this study will discuss the government's efforts to increase the EoDB ranking as a form of legal and economic development as well as small lawsuits as a reform of Indonesian civil procedural law. This study will use socio-legal methods, where studying law does not solely use laws/legislative regulations, but also uses an interdisciplinary approach. That law as a tool of social engineering will be greatly influenced by power/government as a maker of laws and policies. So,  to  realize  the  State's  goals  as  stipulated  in paragraph 4 of the 1945 Constitution, the State must make efforts to increase economic development, through improvement efforts in the 10 EoDB Word Bank Indicator sectors. For this reason, it is important to position the role of business dispute resolution institutions as institutions that examine and adjudicate final and binding business disputes so that investors do not remain in time- consuming legal issues for too long which will impact investments.Abstrak :Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis memegang peranan penting dalam pembangunan hukum dan ekonomi suatu Negara. Bahwa para investor akan berupaya berinvestasi ketika kondusifitas sebuah negara menunjukan peranannya. Salah satu tolak ukur kemudahan investor masuk ke Indoneisa diantaranya terdapat 10 indikator sebagaimana yang disampaikan oleh Bank Dunia dalam surveynya. Untuk itu kajian ini akan membahas mengenai upaya pemerintah dalam menaikkan rangking EoDB  sebagai  bentuk  pembangunan hukum dan ekonomi serta gugatan sederhana sebagai pembaharuan hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Kajian ini akan menggunakan metode sosio legal, dimana mengkaji hukum tidak semata-mata menggunakan hukum/peraturan perundang-undangan semata, namun juga menggunakan pendekatan  interdisipliner. Bahwasannya  Hukum  sebagai Law as tool of Sosial Enggineering, akan sangat dipengaruhi oleh  kekuasaan/pemerintah sebagai  pembuat  hukum  dan kebijakan. Sehingg untuk mewujudkan tujuan Negara sebagaimana alenia ke 4 UUD 1945 Negara harus melakukan upaya-upaya sehingga mampu meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi,  melalui  upaya  perbaikan di  10  sektor  Indikator EoDB Word Bank. Untuk itu menjadi penting memposisikan peran lembaga penyelesaian sengketa Bisnis sebagai lembaga yang memeriksa dan mengadili sengketa bisnis yang besifat final dan binding sehingga investor tidak terlalu lama berada dalam persoalan hukum yang menyita waktu yang akan berdampak pada investas