Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJLRSA
Saurav Kumar
Womens College, Hazaribag, Jharkhand, India
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Analysis of Sanctions Imposed on Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Broadcasting False News in Accordance With the Provisions of Articles 27 and 28 of The Ite Law Myranika Annie; Saurav Kumar
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): September-October : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administr
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i5.259

Abstract

This study examines the legal basis, implementation, and effectiveness of sanctions imposed on perpetrators of criminal acts related to the dissemination of false news as stipulated in Articles 27 and 28 of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law. The research aims to analyze the extent to which these provisions provide legal certainty, deterrent effects, and protection for the public against misinformation in digital spaces. Using a normative juridical approach, the study reviews statutory regulations, legal principles, and relevant case decisions. The findings indicate that although Articles 27 and 28 of the ITE Law offer a comprehensive legal framework for addressing false news, several issues remain, including overlapping norms, ambiguous terminology, and challenges in law enforcement practices. These limitations affect the consistency of sanctions and the proportionality of criminal liability. The study concludes that clearer guidelines, improved legal interpretation, and strengthened digital literacy are essential to enhance the effectiveness of sanctions and ensure the fair application of the law.
Corporate Criminal Liability in Procurement Activities within Corruption Offenses Suhardi Somomoeljono; Saurav Kumar
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): November-Desember : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administr
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v3i6.272

Abstract

This study analyzes the framework of corporate criminal liability in corruption offenses related to goods procurement. As corporations increasingly participate in public procurement processes, the potential for corrupt practices such as bribery, bid-rigging, collusion, and fraudulent documentation poses significant risks to the integrity of government contracting. This research examines the legal basis for holding corporations criminally accountable, including the criteria for attributing criminal acts to a corporate entity, forms of liability, and applicable sanctions under Indonesian anti-corruption law. The study also reviews relevant judicial decisions to assess how courts interpret and apply corporate liability in procurement-related corruption cases. The findings indicate that although corporate criminal liability is formally recognized, challenges persist in proving corporate intent, identifying responsible managerial roles, and ensuring consistent judicial interpretation. The study concludes that strengthening compliance systems, improving procurement oversight, and providing clearer regulatory guidelines are crucial to enhancing the effectiveness of corporate criminal liability in corruption cases involving goods procurement.
Bribery as a Form of Corruption: A Juridical Analysis and Judicial Practice Suhardi Somomoeljono; Saurav Kumar
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January-February : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administra
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v4i1.273

Abstract

This study examines bribery as a specific form of corruption within the Indonesian legal framework, focusing on its juridical aspects and judicial practice. Bribery, as regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, constitutes a criminal act that undermines public trust, disrupts governmental integrity, and damages the state’s administrative functions. This research analyzes the legal elements of bribery, the scope of criminal liability, and the procedural mechanisms used in investigating and prosecuting bribery cases. Furthermore, the study reviews selected court decisions to evaluate judicial consistency, sentencing patterns, and the effectiveness of judicial reasoning in achieving deterrence. The findings indicate that, despite the existence of strong legal provisions, challenges remain in terms of proving intent, uncovering hidden transactional networks, and ensuring institutional independence in bribery cases. The study concludes that strengthening legal clarity, enhancing investigative capacity, and improving judicial transparency are crucial to increasing the effectiveness of law enforcement against bribery as a corruption offense.
Co-Authors Myranika Annie Suhardi Somomoeljono