Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Al-Syakhsiyyah : Journal of Law and Family Studies
Siti Nur Shoimah
Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Children of Marriages Between Indonesian Citizens and Rohingya: What Are Their Inheritance Rights? Siti Nur Shoimah; Fahmi Ridlol Uyun
Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah UIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v7i1.10373

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to address legal issues related to the rights of children from mixed marriages with stateless persons in Indonesia and to highlight the importance of recognizing children's rights in complex situations involving citizenship status and legal uncertainty. This study employs a normative legal research method by analyzing and examining the regulations governing the status of the Rohingya ethnic group as stateless persons in Indonesia, as well as the inheritance rights of children born to parents who are Indonesian citizens and Rohingya ethnic group members classified as stateless persons. The findings of this study indicate that children born from marriages between Indonesian citizens and stateless Rohingya retain their inheritance rights from both parents. Although such marriages may not be legally registered, they remain valid under religious law, and inheritance rights are based on blood ties, not marriage registration. These children may also inherit land from their Indonesian citizen parents under certain conditions. The contribution of this research lies in its effort to address the gap in legal studies regarding the status of children from mixed marriages with stateless individuals, an issue that has received little attention in national regulations. This study provides an argumentative and normative foundation for the protection of children's rights in transnational and stateless contexts, and encourages the development of more inclusive and equitable legal policies.
The First-Tier Contractual-Evidentiary Gap in Trust-Based Supply Relationships Without Comprehensive Written Contracts Ayu Mustika Pamungkas; Siti Nur Shoimah; Ari Rudata Waspaniadi
JURNAL LEGALITAS Vol 19, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jelta.v19i2.41383

Abstract

Supply chain liability studies have predominantly focused on accountability problems arising from complex multi-tier structures. However, liability uncertainty may also emerge within direct first-tier relationships when transactions rely on trust-based practices without comprehensive written contracts. This study examines how contractual uncertainty, evidentiary limitations, and risk allocation problems develop within a first-tier supply relationship in an Indonesian paper-conversion company. Using an empirical socio-legal case study, the research investigates PT Artaniaga Megah Gemilang (PT AMG). Primary data were obtained through two semi-structured interviews with the company director on 10 and 30 July 2026, complemented by purchase orders, internal business correspondence, and relevant Indonesian civil law provisions. The findings indicate that PT AMG’s business relationships remain legally valid despite the absence of comprehensive written contracts, as demonstrated by agreement, continuous performance, and transactional consistency. Nevertheless, limited documentation creates difficulties in establishing contractual obligations, proving modifications, allocating risks, and determining responsibility when disputes arise. Based on this case, the study proposes the concept of the First-Tier Contractual-Evidentiary Gap, referring to an operationally established relationship lacking sufficient contractual and evidentiary mechanisms to clarify obligations, liability, and risk allocation. Furthermore, the study develops the Risk-Based Relational Contract (RBRC) framework, integrating relational flexibility with minimum mechanisms for documentation, adaptation, and risk governance. RBRC seeks to preserve trust while strengthening legal certainty.
Co-Authors Ari Rudata Waspaniadi Ayu Mustika Pamungkas Fahmi Ridlol Uyun