Yoel Christopher Tjen
Master Program in Statistics, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

COMPANY VALUATION AND PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS BASED ON K-MEANS CLUSTERING IN KOMPAS 100 STOCKS INDEX Rohmatul Fajriyah; Yoel Christopher Tjen
BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Vol 20 No 1 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Publisher : PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/barekengvol20iss1pp0381-0396

Abstract

The capital market plays a vital role in investment, providing a platform for trading long-term financial instruments. Indonesia’s capital market has shown significant growth in recent years. This study aims not only to find stock clusters but to show that grouping stocks based on similar valuation characteristics can serve as a solid foundation for constructing superior-performing portfolios. The Kompas 100 index is used because it represents the most liquid and fundamentally stocks in Indonesia. The k-means clustering method is employed, and the number of clusters is determined using the elbow method. This approach resulted in four clusters, with the cluster identified as containing stocks with low PER, PBV, and PSR, representing the “best” portfolio each year based on valuation. Portfolios were formed from these clusters and compared to benchmark portfolios in Indonesia and globally. Global portfolios used as benchmarks include VSMPX, FXAIX, and SAM Equity. Over five years (2018–2022), the cluster-based portfolios outperformed Indonesian and global benchmarks in 2018, 2021, and 2022, while slightly underperforming global portfolios in 2019 and 2020 but still exceeding Indonesian benchmarks. This confirms that clustering techniques can deliver strong performance compared to conventional methods. A limitation of this study is that it focuses only on return performance without analyzing risk-adjusted returns, which future research should address.