Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Khaydarov Shukhratjon Jumaevich
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
ISSUES OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES DANGEROUS TO LIFE OR HEALTH Khaydarov Shukhratjon Jumaevich
International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law and Political Science
Publisher : PT. Antis International Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijblps.v1i10.219

Abstract

General Background: Crimes that endanger life or health are critical areas of study within legal scholarship, reflecting societal concerns about public safety and individual well-being. Specific Background: This article examines the nuances of responsibility associated with such crimes, reviewing various definitions proposed by legal scholars and presenting a novel definition of life- or health-threatening crimes. Knowledge Gap: Despite existing literature, there remains a lack of comprehensive frameworks that systematically categorize these crimes, particularly regarding their objective and subjective dimensions. Aims: The aim of this study is to elucidate the components of crimes that threaten life or health, exploring their classifications based on object, subject, and methods of commission. Results: The findings reveal a structured analysis of the objective and subjective elements of these crimes, alongside a detailed classification system that enhances understanding of their diverse manifestations and the associated legal responsibilities. Novelty: This article contributes to the field by offering an original definition of life- or health-threatening crimes and a classification framework that integrates both traditional and contemporary perspectives. Implications: The conclusions drawn underscore the necessity for legal systems to adopt clearer definitions and classifications, which could improve the enforcement of laws and enhance protective measures for individuals at risk. Future research should focus on empirical studies to further refine these classifications and examine their practical implications within various legal contexts.
Co-Authors