Mardian Idris Harahap
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Karakter Qur’ani Mahasiswa di Era Digital: Studi Tematik tentang Tabayyun, Etika Bertutur, dan Tanggung Jawab Digital Muhammad Nur Fauzan; Mardian Idris Harahap
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The acceleration of the digital ecosystem drives an information flow that is difficult to filter and gives rise to ethical challenges for the religious academic community. Grounded in the values of the Qur’an, this study focuses on the Qur’anic character of students in three practical domains: information verification (tabayyun), ethics of speech (qaulan), and digital responsibility (amanah). The aim of the study is to examine two core questions: (1) how students apply verification before sharing information; and (2) how Qur’anic speech ethics are implemented in digital interactions—and how the dimensions of digital responsibility (permission, attribution, privacy, security) accompany them. The method used is thematic exegesis (mawḍū‘ī) to map the normative foundations of the Qur’an related to these three values, combined with a descriptive qualitative approach through in-depth interviews and light observation in the context of students’ academic/online communication. The data were analyzed thematically with validity assurance through triangulation and member checking. The findings show the emergence of growing epistemic caution—evident from efforts to delay uploading when in doubt, tracing sources, and comparing references—although consistency is not yet uniform across all channels. In the dimension of speech, the tendency to use clarificatory diction, avoid personal attacks, and include references has increased, while in the domain of amanah, the practices of asking permission and giving attribution are relatively understood, but technical aspects (account security, metadata management, privacy protection) remain weak. The practical implication is the need for operational indicators and concise Qur’an-based digital literacy SOPs at the study program level, including multisource verification protocols, data-anchored clarification formats, and responsibility checklists. Conceptually, this study enriches the literature on Qur’anic character in the platform era while also providing an evaluative baseline for strengthening a culture of academic communication that is valid, courteous, and responsible.
Makna Tajassus dan Ghibah dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar serta Relevansinya terhadap Etika Komunikasi Pesantren Darussalam Siunggam Jae Tsuibatul Aslamiyah Daulay; Mardian Idris Harahap
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (May)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v6i2.941

Abstract

This study is motivated by the persistence of unethical communication practices, such as negative suspicion, fault-finding, and speaking ill of others in social interaction, including within Islamic boarding schools. It aims to explain the meaning of tajassus and ghibah in QS. Al-Hujurat [49]: 12 according to Hamka’s interpretation in Tafsir Al-Azhar and to analyze their relevance to communication ethics at Darussalam Siunggam Jae Islamic Boarding School. This research uses a qualitative approach by combining library research and fieldwork. Library data were obtained from Tafsir Al-Azhar and related academic literature, while field data were collected through observation and interviews with the pesantren leader, male and female teachers, and students. The data were analyzed descriptively and thematically. The findings show that Hamka interprets tajassus as the act of seeking others’ faults rooted in negative suspicion, while ghibah is understood as talking about someone’s shortcomings behind their back. Both damage honor, trust, and social harmony. The study implies the need to strengthen pesantren communication ethics through husnuzan, tabayyun, self-control in speech, and moral exemplarity