Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NIHAYAH AN-NUR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Nadia Amanda
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Ummul Ayman Pidie Jaya, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KRITIK IBNU TAIMIYAH TERHADAP TASAWUF ANTARA PURIFIKASI DAN PENOLAKAN Nadia Amanda
NIHAYAH: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): NIHAYAH: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Yayasan An-Nur Meunara Baro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65802/nihayah.v1i2.16

Abstract

Sufism has long been an integral part of Islamic intellectual and spiritual tradition, offering a path of inner purification and ethical refinement. However, throughout its historical development, Sufism has also faced critical scrutiny, especially from scholars who prioritize theological purity and strict adherence to Sharia. Among these critics, Ibn Taymiyyah stands out as a central figure who rigorously challenged various aspects of Sufism, particularly those rooted in philosophical mysticism. His criticism, however, does not represent a wholesale rejection of Sufism, but rather a call for purifying Islamic teachings from elements of bid‘ah (religious innovation), syncretism, and speculative metaphysics that deviate from core Islamic tenets. Ibn Taymiyyah draws a clear distinction between Sunni Sufism, which emphasizes piety and ethical conduct, and philosophical Sufism, which promotes mystical doctrines such as wahdat al-wujūd (unity of being), hulūl (incarnation), and ittihād (union with the divine). This article aims to explore Ibn Taymiyyah’s critical stance using historical and theological approaches, and to assess the relevance of his views in the context of contemporary Islamic discourse. This study adopts a library research method and descriptive-critical analysis of both primary sources and recent academic literature from 2018–2025. The findings indicate that Ibn Taymiyyah’s approach is more corrective than dismissive, as he still acknowledges the authenticity of Sufi figures such as Al-Junaid and Al-Fudhail ibn ‘Iyadh, who adhered strictly to Islamic law in their spiritual practices. His perspective offers a methodological foundation for maintaining balance between sound creed and legitimate spirituality in the modern era.
MEMBEBASKAN RUANG KELAS PAI DARI KEKERASAN SIMBOLIK MELALUI PENDEKATAN HUMANISTIK Nadia Amanda
AN-NUR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): AN-NUR : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran
Publisher : Yayasan An-Nur Meunara Baro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65802/an-nur.v1i2.65

Abstract

Symbolic violence in Islamic Religious Education (PAI) classrooms is a subtle yet systemic form of domination, manifested through judgmental language, asymmetrical power relations between teachers and students, and the imposition of obedience without critical space. This situation weakens students’ religious reasoning and diminishes reflective spiritual awareness. This article emphasizes the urgency of adopting a humanistic approach in Islamic education, which upholds compassion, dialogue, and respect for individual potential as pedagogical foundations. The study aims to identify the forms of symbolic violence in PAI learning and explain how a humanistic approach can liberate classrooms from such domination. Using a qualitative-descriptive method, data were collected through classroom observations and interviews with teachers and students at a public junior high school in Banda Aceh, followed by thematic analysis. The findings reveal that symbolic violence persists in PAI teaching practices, yet a more humanistic strategy encourages dialogue, empathy, and critical awareness among students. The theoretical contribution of this paper lies in broadening the discourse of Islamic pedagogy toward symbolic liberation, while its practical significance offers recommendations for curriculum reform and teacher training based on humanistic ethics.
Co-Authors