Dedi Irwan
Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas PGRI Pontianak

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

University Students’ Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Work: Efficiency, Learning Quality, and Academic Integrity Dedi Irwan
Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI tools, has reshaped academic practices in higher education, raising concerns regarding learning quality, academic effort, and ethical conduct. While AI offers significant efficiency gains, its implications for student engagement and integrity remain contested. This study examines university students’ patterns of AI use, their orientation toward efficiency and learning quality, perceptions of academic effort, ethical considerations, and attitudes toward institutional regulation in AI-mediated academic contexts. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 316 undergraduate students across multiple universities and study programs. Responses were gathered through a self-administered online questionnaire consisting of 10 Likert-type items (four- to six-point scales) and analysed using descriptive and correlational statistics in SPSS. The findings reveal that AI use among students is nearly universal, indicating its normalization as an academic resource. Students predominantly employ AI to improve efficiency and accelerate task completion, with efficiency-oriented use more strongly endorsed than learning-oriented use. At the same time, students acknowledge that AI use may reduce academic effort, highlighting a tension between productivity gains and meaningful learning engagement. Ethical concerns are recognised, and perceptions of potential misuse are evident. Importantly, students demonstrate openness toward institutional regulation and AI-aware assessment practices, suggesting a regulation-ready rather than resistant stance. These findings highlight the need for pedagogical and policy approaches that balance efficiency, learning quality, and academic integrity in AI integration.   Integrasi cepat artificial intelligence (AI), terutama AI generatif, telah mengubah praktik akademik di pendidikan tinggi dan memunculkan kekhawatiran tentang kualitas pembelajaran, upaya akademik, dan integritas. Meskipun AI menawarkan efisiensi, implikasinya terhadap keterlibatan belajar dan perilaku etis masih diperdebatkan. Penelitian ini mengkaji pola penggunaan AI oleh mahasiswa, orientasi terhadap efisiensi dan kualitas belajar, persepsi mengenai upaya akademik, pertimbangan etis, serta sikap terhadap regulasi institusional. Menggunakan survei kuantitatif potong lintang, data dikumpulkan dari 316 mahasiswa sarjana dari berbagai universitas dan program studi. Data diperoleh melalui kuesioner daring dengan 10 butir skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan korelasional. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan AI hampir universal, menandakan normalisasi AI sebagai sumber akademik. Penggunaan berorientasi efisiensi lebih dominan dibanding penggunaan berorientasi pembelajaran. Mahasiswa mengakui bahwa penggunaan AI dapat menurunkan upaya akademik, menciptakan ketegangan antara efisiensi dan keterlibatan belajar yang bermakna. Kekhawatiran etis teridentifikasi dan persepsi potensi penyalahgunaan terlihat. Mahasiswa juga menunjukkan keterbukaan terhadap regulasi institusional dan penilaian yang melek-AI, mencerminkan sikap siap-regulasi dibanding penolakan. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya desain kebijakan dan pedagogi yang menyeimbangkan efisiensi, kualitas belajar, dan integritas akademik dalam integrasi AI.
Why Cafés Matter: Rethinking Formal Learning Spaces in Indonesian Higher Education Dedi Irwan
Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing use of cafés as learning spaces among university students reflects broader changes in how learning is organised beyond formal academic environments. While previous studies have explored informal learning spaces, empirical evidence from developing higher education contexts remains limited. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates why Indonesian university students choose cafés over libraries as learning spaces and examines the perceived learning affordances of both environments. Using a quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 355 undergraduate students across diverse academic disciplines and years of study. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation analyses with chi-square tests were employed to examine associations between learning space preferences, perceived productivity, collaboration, creativity, motivation, and spatial design. The findings reveal that cafés are strongly associated with collaborative learning, creative idea exchange, and higher learning motivation, whereas libraries remain central for focus-intensive and individual academic tasks. Rather than competing spaces, cafés and libraries function as complementary components within students’ broader learning ecology. Interpreted through Third Place Theory, Affordance Theory, and Learning Ecology, the results highlight a critical mismatch between students’ contemporary learning practices and the design of formal learning spaces. The study concludes by arguing for a rethinking of Indonesian formal learning spaces toward hybrid, multi-zone learning environments that integrate the functional and motivational affordances currently sought by students in informal settings.