Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Burhanudin
Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Disparitas Putusan Peninjauan Kembali(Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 109 Pk/Pid/2007 Dan No. 133 Pk/Pid/2011)dalam Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Munir Said Thalib Dan Penggunaan Surat Palsu Oleh Terpidana Pollycarpus Budihari Priyanto Muhammad Ulin Nuha; Burhanudin; Mara Sutan Rambe
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.16540

Abstract

This research analyzes the implementation of judicial review applications filed by both public prosecutors and defendants, focusing on the applicants’ legal grounds and the judges’ considerations in Supreme Court Decisions No. 109 PK/Pid/2007 and No. 133 PK/Pid/2011. The study employs a normative juridical approach, which examines relevant laws, legal principles, and scholarly doctrines to address the research questions systematically. The findings reveal that the right to file a judicial review is not limited to convicted persons but may also be exercised by public prosecutors. A judicial review may be accepted when judicial error occurs during the trial or when new evidence (novum) emerges that could significantly alter the verdict. The research further emphasizes that judges must act independently, free from external influence, and base their rulings solely on legal facts and judicial conviction.
Pemidanaan Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Analisis Putusan Nomor 833/Pid/B/2018/PN.JKT.Sel Farahdiba Bagiawan Lisannul Abror; Burhanudin; Muhammad Ishar Helmi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v7i1.27849

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of law in the sentencing of perpetrators of sexual harassment and the judicial considerations in deciding such cases, particularly when the criminal sanctions imposed are inconsistent with the prevailing legal provisions. The research aims to understand the implementation of criminal law in punishing offenders and the reasoning of judges in adjudicating sexual harassment cases, with specific reference to the South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 833/Pid/B/2018/PN.JKT.Sel. The study adopts both the case approach and the statute approach, employing a normative legal research method that examines the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and the relevant court decision as primary sources of analysis. The findings reveal that in the referenced case, the public prosecutor formulated an alternative indictment under Article 290(1) or Article 281(2) of the Criminal Code. The panel of judges ultimately applied Article 281(2) and sentenced the defendant to ten months of imprisonment. The judgment was based on three primary considerations: the testimony of witnesses, the visum et repertum (medical report), and the defendant’s own statement during the trial.
Co-Authors Farahdiba Bagiawan Lisannul Abror Mara Sutan Rambe Muhammad Ishar Helmi Muhammad Ulin Nuha