Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Legal Certainty of Sugar Import Corruption from the Perspective of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 117 of 2015 (Case Study of Decision Number 55/PID.SUS-TPK/2025/PT DKI) Joni Antono; Ernawati Ernawati
International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijse.v6i1.344

Abstract

The normative ambiguity in Articles 6 and 7 of the Minister of Trade Regulation Number 117 of 2015 creates room for interpretation regarding the state of emergency. This ambiguity has created legal uncertainty in the sugar import corruption case, as reflected in Decision Number 55/PID.SUS-TPK/2025/PT DKI. This study aims to analyze the construction of the state of emergency in the regulation and evaluate the application of the elements of the crime of corruption in the court decision from the perspective of legal certainty. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach, using Jan M. Otto's theory of legal certainty and the doctrine of the state of necessity as analytical tools. The results show that Permendag 117/2015 contains a normative gap regarding the limits of the state of emergency, which triggers the criminalization of the policy. Furthermore, the application of the elements of abuse of authority and state losses in the decision does not meet the principle of legal certainty because it is based on potential losses and ignores the validity of valid administrative permits.
Protection of Muslim Consumers Against Food Products with Fake Halal Labels from The Perspective of Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection Farihatun Azmi; Ernawati Ernawati
International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijse.v6i1.350

Abstract

The halal status of food products is considered a fundamental aspect for Muslim consumers because it is directly related to religious beliefs and the right to correct information. However, in practice, misuse of halal labels is still found, misleading consumers, one example being the case of the Widuran Fried Chicken Restaurant in Solo City. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for Muslim consumers against the circulation of food products using fake halal labels, as well as to analyze the legal liability of business actors according to regulations on consumer protection and halal product guarantees. The research method applied is normative legal research conducted through a statutory regulatory approach and literature study, with qualitative data analysis. The results show that legal protection for Muslim consumers is implemented through two main instruments: a preventive mechanism that requires business actors to provide information regarding the halal status of products accurately, transparently, and responsibly, and a repressive mechanism in the form of administrative, civil, and criminal fines. Business actors proven to have included halal claims that are inconsistent with legal provisions can be held accountable for losses suffered by consumers. This study concludes that the implementation of related regulations is not yet fully optimal, so it is necessary to increase supervision and legal awareness of business actors to ensure the fulfillment of Muslim consumer rights.