Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi dan Geomatika
Bilal Adiyatullah
"Student at Geomatics Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung, 35365, Indonesia"
Education

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
INTERPRETING SURFACE REPRESENTATION THROUGH COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIDAR-DERIVED TERRAIN AND SURFACE MODELS Bilal Adiyatullah; Jeremia Tri Andra Manalu; Rizqi Aulia; Muhammad Ulin Nuha
Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi dan Geomatika Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Volume 09 Issue 01 Year 2026
Publisher : Department of Geodesy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University,Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/elipsoida.2026.31747

Abstract

Accurate representation of the Earth's surface is fundamental for geospatial analysis and environmental studies. This research examines and compares the Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and Digital Surface Model (DSM), both generated from LiDAR data acquired over the ITERA campus, a region characterized by heterogeneous land cover, including built-up areas, vegetation, and open ground. Data were collected using a DJI M350 drone equipped with an APUS sensor at an altitude of 100 meters. The methodology involved preprocessing point cloud data, classifying ground and non-ground points, and generating elevation models using Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) interpolation with a 0.5-meter grid. Vertical accuracy was evaluated through 12 reference checkpoints measured with Geodetic GPS technology. Results demonstrate that the DSM achieved higher vertical accuracy, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.060 meters, compared to the DTM's RMSE of 0.342 meters. Analysis of the normalized DSM (nDSM) revealed elevation differences of up to ±38 meters between DSM and DTM, effectively identifying vertical structures such as dense vegetation and campus buildings. These findings confirm the DSM is more reliable for analyzing the absolute heights of surface objects, while the DTM remains essential for modeling natural landforms, even in areas with complex land cover and greater uncertainty.
Co-Authors Jeremia Tri Andra Manalu Muhammad Ulin Nuha Rizqi Aulia