Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WANUA : Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Jurnal Trias Politika Journal of International and Local Studies
Hasan, Finahliyah
Program Studi Hubungan Internasional Universitas Bosowa
Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PRE-EMPTIVE SELF DEFENCE GEORGE W. BUSH, JR. TERHADAP AFGHANISTAN Finahliyah Hasan
WANUA : Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): WANUA : Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Departemen Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Univesitas Hasanuddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

PESD becomes controversy because its legality under international law particularly in Article 51 of the UN Charter does not set any explicit reference to this action. The academics differently interpret the contents of the chapter, some academics legalize preemptive and others regard it as an act that violates international law because it do not fulfill two conditions the right of defense permissible. The two conditions are there has been an armed attack and the UN Security Council has taken measures in advance. In addition to Article 51 of the charter, legitimacy and precedent of preemptive action is also present in customary international law, which this action can be performed under certain conditions if meets two conditions: necessity and proportionality. The findings of this research are preemptive self-defense by the United States against Afghanistan does not violate international law. It is based on the transformation of various forms of threats and no longer just an attack by the armed forces as well as terrorism, so the rigid interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter is no longer adequate. In addition, the policy of United States meets the elements of necessity and proportionality, which preemptive action is permissible under customary international law. PESD menuai kontroversi terkait legalitasnya karena dalam hukum internasional khususnya piagam PBB pasal 51 tidak mengatur secara eksplisit mengenai tindakan ini. Para akademisi mengintrepretasikan secara berbeda isi dari pasal tersebut, sehingga sebagian melegalkan tindakan preemptive dan sebagian lain menganggapnya sebagai suatu tindakan yang melanggar hukum internasional karena tidak memenuhi dua syarat diperbolehkannya negara melakukan hak membela diri. Dua syarat tersebut yakni telah terjadi serangan bersenjata dan DK PBB telah mengambil tindakan terlebih dahulu. Selain piagam PBB pasal 51, legitimasi dan preseden dari tindakan preemptive juga terdapat dalam hukum kebiasaan internasional, dimana tindakan ini dapat dilakukan dalam kondisi tertentu apabila memenuhi dua syarat yakni necessity dan proportionality. Penemuan dari penelitian ini adalah kebijakan preemptive self defence yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Serikat terhadap Afghanistan tidaklah melanggar hukum internasional. Hal ini berdasar pada transformasi berbagai bentuk ancaman dan bukan lagi sekedar serangan oleh pasukan bersenjata seperti halnya terorisme, sehingga penafsiran kaku pasal 51 piagam PBB tidak lagi memadai. Disamping itu, kebijakan Amerika serikat memenuhi unsur necessity dan proportionality, yang dimana merupakan syarat diperbolehkannya suatu tindakan preemptive dalam hukum kebiasaan internasional.
POLITIK DAN KEMANUSIAAN: RELASI TUMPANG TINDIH DALAM PENANGANAN PENGUNGSI DI INDONESIA Finahliyah Hasan
JURNAL TRIAS POLITIKA Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober 2023, Jurnal Trias Politika
Publisher : Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33373/jtp.v7i2.5135

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a complex humanitarian crisis, where humanitarian assistance not only relies on humanitarian organizations but requires the involvement of the state, humanitarian practices can no longer refer to the basic principles of humanity which are considered apolitical. This article aims to show the overlapping relationship between political interests and humanitarian practices in the context of refugee crises in the non-signatory state of the global refugee regime. A qualitative approach is used as a method to provide interpretation of the data found where the main focus is on primary data and journal articles. It is expected that this article will provide a comprehensive picture of how political interests are associated with the effort of refugees protection during transit in non-signatory of refugee convention such as Indonesia. Although it is not obliged to accept refugees as a consequence of not having ratified the 1951 refugee convention and 1967 protocol, Indonesia is trying to adapt its domestic policies to various political considerations without ignoring the humanitarian aspect. However, in practice, Indonesian refugee handling is problematic because it is based not only on humanitarian concerns but also on the calculation of costs and benefits and the refugee framing. ABSTRAK Dalam krisis kemanusiaan yang kompleks, dimana asistensi kemanusiaan tidak lagi hanya mengandalkan organisasi-organisasi kemanusiaan tetapi memerlukan pelibatan negara, maka praktek kemanusiaan tidak lagi dapat mengacu pada prinsip dasar kemanusiaan yang diklaim apolitis. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan relasi tumpang tindih antara kepentingan politik dan praktek kemanusiaan dalam konteks krisis pengungsi di negara yang tidak menjadi bagian dari rezim pengungsi global. Pendekatan kualitatif digunakan sebagai metode untuk memberikan interpretasi atas data-data yang ditemukan dimana acuan utama fokus pada data primer serta artikel jurnal. Riset ini diharapkan dapat memberikan gambaran secara komprehensif bagaimana kepentingan politik berasosiasi dengan upaya perlindungan pengungsi selama transit di negara yang tidak meratifikasi konvensi pengungsi seperti Indonesia. Walaupun tidak memiliki kewajiban untuk menerima pengungsi sebagai konsekuensi belum meratifikasi konvensi pengungsi 1951 dan protokol 1967, Indonesia berupaya menyesuaikan kebijakan domestiknya dengan beragam pertimbangan politik tanpa mengindahkan aspek kemanusiaan. Namun pada prakteknya, penanganan pengungsi di Indonesia menjadi problematik dikarenakan bukan hanya kalkulasi cost and benefit tetapi framing terkait pengungsi itu sendiri.
Human Rights Problem of Stranded Refugees in A Transit Country: Case Study in Makassar City, Indonesia Finahliyah Hasan
Journal of International and Local Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): January
Publisher : Universitas Bosowa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/jils.v2i1.704

Abstract

Global forced displacement mostly by conflict and persecution continues to escalate dramatically at the end of 2016 and has never been higher since World War II. People fleeing war or another catastrophe who cannot return to their country of origin have been granted asylum in the foreign country. They will be processed to have their claims for refugee status thoroughly assessed by UNHCR in which is named after as a Refugee Status Determination (RSD), a legal process by government or UNHCR to determine whether a person seeking international protection is considered a refugee under international, regional or national law. In fact, the vast majority of refugees who intend to migrate to developed states as their final destination, generally settle first in a stable and middleincome country such as Indonesia. As a result, Indonesia is swamped by refugees, and their condition has been exacerbated by Indonesia status which is not the signatory of the 1951 Refugee Convention. This status leads to the limitation for accessing human rights of refugees. Thus fulfilling refugee's rights are prevalent due to the uncertainty for resettlement to the third country. Notwithstanding some institutions such as International Organization for Migration (IOM), Immigration, and Social Service department have conducted programs for a refugee to overcome their lack of activities, the implementation is uneven. The findings of this research demonstrates that (1) when refugees are not permitted to get a job, have limited access to education and affordable health facilities, (2) The program sufferes from various difficulties due to the lack of cooperation with related agencies and the lack of human resources, they continue to suffer with their refugee status being negatively affected. This study used a participatory method, observation and literature review. Data is obtained through the interview of refugees and related authorities in different locations. During collecting the data, the author implemented several empowerment programs in refugee community housing as a strategy of the author who encounters difficulties while getting information.
Co-Authors