Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam
Bagus Damar Galih Permadi
universitas_islam_negeri_sunan-kalijaga
Religion Humanities Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Kritik Orientalis terhadap Hadis: Atas Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher dan Joseph Schacht Bagus Damar Galih Permadi; Rijal Khoirul Anam
NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Volume 23 Nomor 1 2026
Publisher : Research Institute and Community Engagement of UIN MADURA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/nuansa.v23i1.19847

Abstract

This study systematically examines the thoughts of Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht in orientalist criticism of the authenticity of hadith through a literature review (Systematic Literature Review) based on the PRISMA guidelines to filter 11,705 articles into 40 relevant studies (n = 40). The main objectives include: (1) mapping Schacht's theory of skepticism projecting back, argumentum e silentio, and common link as well as Goldziher's sanad-matan criticism approach, (2) comparing the points of agreement and differences in Schacht's focus on legal hadith versus Goldziher's on the social construction of the post-Prophet hadith corpus, and (3) evaluating the implications for contemporary hadith studies. The results show the dominance of qualitative studies based on library research (±90%), with the consensus that both figures open up space for methodological dialogue even though they are often accused of being selective and reductive in their choice of sources. Theory mapping reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each Schacht excels in historical sanad analysis, Goldziher emphasizes the socio-political context while contemporary academic responses emphasize the integration of classical sanad-matan verification with matan analysis and Western historical-philological frameworks. This study recommends the development of an interdisciplinary framework, the involvement of empirical data, and the expansion of non-English literature to enrich modern hadith studies in an inclusive and contextual manner.
Co-Authors Rijal Khoirul Anam