Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Mirza Athaya Ghaisan Hakeem
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Telaah Filsafat Hukum terhadap Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Dekonstruksi Paradigma Retributif dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia Mirza Athaya Ghaisan Hakeem; Aqiila Banyu Valentara; Achmad Faidzuddin; Muhammad Avin Athalla Rilya
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17851225

Abstract

The development of criminal law in Indonesia shows a paradigm shift from a retributive to a restorative approach, particularly following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the new Criminal Code (KUHP). This study aims to analyze the position of restorative justice as a mechanism to deconstruct the retributive paradigm and to evaluate its implementation in Indonesian criminal sentencing practices. The research uses normative legal methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, examining legal principles, frameworks, and relevant doctrines. The findings indicate that restorative justice plays a strategic role in shifting the focus of criminal law from mere punishment to victim restoration, offender accountability, and social reconciliation. Its application is supported by normative regulations and mediation practices involving victims, offenders, families, and communities, delivering substantive justice while reducing recidivism. Despite challenges such as varying interpretations among law enforcement officials and power imbalances between victims and offenders, restorative justice proves to be an effective mechanism for establishing a more humane, responsive, and just criminal justice system in Indonesia.
Transformasi Paradigma Filsafat Hukum di Era Kecerdasan Buatan: Analisis Filosofis atas Legitimasi, Akuntabilitas, dan Keadilan Yurisprudensi Berbasis AI di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Implementasi Sistem Analisis Putusan di Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang) Mirza Athaya Ghaisan Hakeem
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17851262

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought significant transformations to judicial processes, particularly in legal analysis and decision-making. This study aims to analyze how the legitimacy of AI-assisted jurisprudence can be maintained, how the accountability and fairness of AI-influenced court decisions can be ensured, and the implications for contemporary legal philosophy in Indonesia. The research employs a contemporary legal philosophy approach, combining normative, theoretical, and empirical analyses, focusing on the case study of the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system implementation at Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM), which analyzed 408 court decisions related to human trafficking crimes (TPPO). The results indicate that jurisprudential legitimacy can be preserved if final decisions remain under the authority of judges, while AI serves as a tool to enhance efficiency, consistency, and decision accuracy. Accountability is maintained through algorithm audits, transparency, and human oversight, whereas substantive justice requires human consideration of social, cultural, and moral contexts. These findings highlight a paradigm shift in Indonesian legal philosophy toward a hybrid model integrating technology with human ethical-legal judgment, while preserving the integrity, morality, and legitimacy of jurisprudence. This study is expected to serve as a reference for developing regulations and AI applications in the Indonesian legal system.
Co-Authors Achmad Faidzuddin Aqiila Banyu Valentara Muhammad Avin Athalla Rilya