Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Nglurug Awig-Awig: Deviation Against Catur Brata Penyepian by Younger Generation on Nyepi Day Hindu Balinese in Lampung Komang Danu Artha Arya Wiguna; Bartoven Vivit Nurdin; Ifaty Fadliliana Sari; Suwarno Suwarno; Syifaa Sabianova Addina Turki Turki; Mathis Corbin
Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Institutional and Social Transformation in Contemporary Society
Publisher : PT Pro Panoramic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64595/jrlpl.v2n3.p229-250

Abstract

This study examines deviations from Catur Brata Penyepian during the Nyepi holiday among the Balinese Hindu community in Dharma Agung Mataram Village, Central Lampung, commonly referred to as nglurug awig awig. Catur Brata are the four main rules for observing Nyepi that should not be violated. However, in some cases, the younger generation still commits deviations. The Balinese community in Dharma Agung Mataram Village, Seputih Mataram District, Central Lampung, is Hindu and transmigrated to Lampung around 1963, bringing their religion and strong traditional customs with them. However, deviations against Catur Brata Penyepian still frequently occur. The theories used in this study are Hirschi's (1969) theory of social control and Lemert's (1951) theory of deviance. This study uses a qualitative research method, employing data collection techniques such as in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation. Data analysis is carried out through data reduction, data display, and data verification. The results of the study indicate two categories of violations committed by the younger generation: minor and serious. The causes of violations include a lack of religious understanding, economic pressures, the influence of modernity, weak socialization of the Catur Brata Penyepian, and lax supervision (lack of social control) in a relatively heterogeneous society. None of this can be categorized as social deviation or social pathology, but rather as a violation. The response from the community, traditional leaders, and Pecalang was generally disappointment, concern, and annoyance, with appropriate sanctions being imposed.
Habitus dan Tantangan Sosiokultural dalam Tata Kelola Koperasi Desa Merah-Putih di Pedesaan Lampung: Sebuah Studi Antropologi Pembangunan Bartoven Vivit Nurdin; Rezha Marsya Nabila; Damar Wibisono; Syifaa Sabionova Addina Turki
Jurnal Bina Praja Vol 18 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Research and Development Agency Ministry of Home Affairs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21787/jbp.18.2026.3025

Abstract

This study analyzes the habitus and socio-cultural challenges in the governance of Red-and-White rural village cooperatives in rural Lampung from the perspective of the anthropology of development. Cooperatives are understood not only as economic entities but also as social spaces shaped by local values, norms, power relations, and cultural practices, and many development programs falter when these dimensions are overlooked. We employed a qualitative, constructivist approach drawing on in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, with findings analyzed through data triangulation. Pierre Bourdieu’s (1977) theory of habitus serves as the main framework for explaining how social dispositions inform cooperative governance. The research was conducted in two pilot villages in Lampung, Rejomulyo and Bumisari. The findings indicate that cooperative success depends heavily on a village’s socio-economic character. In Rejomulyo, where most residents are farmers, cooperatives are most effective when focused on agriculture, whereas in Bumisari, which rests on micro, small, and medium enterprises, services, and trade, cooperatives develop along those lines. Cooperatives concentrate on absorbing local farm produce, selling fertilizer, operating minimarkets, and opening pharmacies, yet remain hesitant to offer savings and loan services. Challenges include limited capital, a small membership base, limited human-resource capacity, restricted access to partnerships, weak coordination with local governments, and competition from loan sharks and middlemen. The community’s collective habitus—marked by patronage, kinship ties, and social hierarchy—shapes cooperative governance. We argue that attending to local habitus is essential to strengthening cooperative institutions more adaptively and sustainably.