Bambang Supperianto
Universitas Putra Indonesia "YPTK" Padang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Automated Medical Classification of Human Brain Tumors Leveraging the Xception Convolutional Neural Network Bambang Supperianto; Syafri Arlis
Jurnal Media Computer Science Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : LPPJPHKI Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jmcs.v5i1.9356

Abstract

Brain tumors are among the most critical neurological disorders, marked by abnormal cell proliferation within the brain, either benign or malignant,adversely impacting cognitive, motor, and overall patient quality of life.Accurate and prompt diagnosis is pivotal for determining effective treatment and improving survival outcomes. While Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MIRI) remains the standard diagnostic tool due to its high soft-tissue contrast, manual interpretation is labor-intensive, expertise-dependent, and subject to observer bias. Consequently, deep learning approaches, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have garnered considerable attention for automating brain tumor classification with superior efficiency and accuracy. This study presents a medical classification model for human brain tumors based on the Xception CNN architecture. The model was developed using a publicly available MRI dataset comprising 2,875 images categorized into glioma, meningioma, and pituitary tumor classes. Preprocessing involved resizing, normalization, and data augmentation. The model was initialized with ImageNet weights and fine-tuned for the three-class classification task with softmax activation.The proposed model achieved robust performance, recording test accuracy of 98.4% and an average F1-score of 98.5%, indicating balanced precision and recall. Confusion matrix and error analysis revealed minimal and evenly distributed misclassifications, while training dynamics showed rapid convergence with no significant overfitting.These findings demonstrate the effectiveness and clinical feasibility of the Xception CNN for automated brain tumor diagnosis. Future research should validate the approach on larger, multi-institutional datasets and integrate interpretability techniques to strengthen clinical applicability.
AHP Implementation in Best Lecturer Selection at FKIP UNIVED Bambang Supperianto; Magdalena Sundari
Jurnal Media Computer Science Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : LPPJPHKI Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37676/jmcs.v5i1.10783

Abstract

The determination of the best lecturer is a critical strategic process in enhancing institutional quality assurance in higher education. Conventional evaluation approaches are frequently characterized by subjectivity and the absence of structured multi-criteria weighting mechanisms, leading to potential inconsistencies in decision outcomes. This study proposes an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Decision Support System (DSS) to improve the objectivity and reliability of best lecturer selection at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu. AHP is employed to structure the decision hierarchy and derive priority weights through pairwise comparison matrices, ensuring consistency in multi-criteria evaluation. The assessment framework incorporates pedagogical competence, professional competence, personality, social competence, and academic performance within the tridharma of higher education. Empirical data were collected through structured questionnaires and institutional performance records. The consistency ratio (CR) of all comparison matrices met the acceptable threshold (CR < 0.1), indicating reliable judgment consistency. The proposed model enhances transparency by quantifying subjective judgments into measurable priority scores and generating a systematic ranking of lecturers. This study contributes methodologically by integrating hierarchical decision modeling with institutional performance evaluation, offering a replicable framework for academic quality assessment. The findings demonstrate that the AHP-based DSS provides a robust and accountable decision-making tool for strategic lecturer evaluation in higher education institutions.