Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Engineering and Technology
Azzahra Permatasari Suwandi
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Universitas Nusaputra";}
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Dentistry Engineering Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Veterinary

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Student Achievement Prediction Comparison Of Naïve Bayes And Svm Using Ai Optimization In Smpn 5 Azzahra Permatasari Suwandi; Sudin Saepudin; Gina Syabani Yuda
International Journal of Health Engineering and Technology Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): IJHET MAY 2026
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhet.v5i1.793

Abstract

This study aims to build a predictive model of student learning achievement by comparing the performance of Naive Bayes algorithm and Support Vector Machine (SVM) optimized using Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Grid Search. Methods used in this study include data collection, preprocessing, data sharing, application of SMOTE to handle data imbalances, as well as parameter optimization using Grid Search. Next, the model was built using Naive Bayes algorithm and SVM, then evaluated using accuracy metrics to determine the best performance. The results showed that the accuracy of Naive Bayes algorithm before SMOTE application was 71%, but decreased to 56% after SMOTE application. Meanwhile, the SVM algorithm showed stable results with an accuracy of 68% both before and after the application of SMOTE. This shows that optimization techniques do not always improve the performance of the model, depending on the characteristics of the data used. Thus, SVM models are considered more consistent, while Naive Bayes is more sensitive to data changes. The resulting Model can be used as an aid in decision-making in the field of education to more accurately identify the level of student achievement.
Co-Authors Gina Syabani Yuda Sudin Saepudin