Ifan Syafiuddin
Universitas Darunnajah, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Integrating Good Waqf Governance and Visionary Leadership in Pesantren Waqf Management:  Institutional Law as an Enabling Prerequisite Hadiyanto Arif; Ifan Syafiuddin; Wahyudi Milbala Putra Panggar
Sinthop: Media Kajian Pendidikan, Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): July-December
Publisher : Lembaga Aneuk Muda Peduli Umat, Bekerjasama dengan LaKaspia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69548/sinthop.v5.i2.130.273-294

Abstract

Waqf management in Indonesian pesantren faces persistent challenges related to institutional status, administrative capacity, accountability, leadership, and productive asset development. Existing studies generally examine Good Waqf Governance (GWG), leadership in Islamic educational institutions, and institutional law as separate domains, leaving their interaction insufficiently integrated in the context of pesantren-based waqf management. This study develops the Integrated Pesantren Waqf Governance Model (IPTGM) as a preliminary conceptual framework combining institutional law, GWG, and visionary leadership. A Systematic Literature Review guided by PRISMA 2020 was conducted using publications identified through Google Scholar, SINTA, Scopus, and supplementary reference searching. Of 124 initially identified records, 21 peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2025 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the synthesis. The review was complemented by a focused normative analysis of Law No. 41 of 2004 on Waqf and Law No. 18 of 2019 on Pesantren. The findings indicate that institutional law provides an enabling regulatory environment but does not independently ensure effective governance. GWG contributes principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence, and fairness, while visionary and values-based leadership may support institutional direction, organizational adaptation, professional capacity, and service-oriented accountability. The synthesis generates four propositions concerning institutional readiness, productive waqf management, leadership-supported GWG implementation, and multidimensional pesantren sustainability.
The Transformation of Pesantren Education Quality Management in the Digital Era: An Integrative Literature Review Ifan Syafiuddin; Sabiila Khoirin Ni'mah; Uswatun Khasanah; Hasan Darajat
Jurnal Ilmiah Guru Madrasah Vol 5 No 2 (2026): July-December
Publisher : LaKaspia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69548/jigm.v5i2.107

Abstract

Digital transformation is changing how pesantren manage learning, administration, and institutional accountability while raising concerns about the continuity of religious authority and educational traditions. This study examines the transformation of pesantren education quality management and formulates a context-sensitive framework for the digital era. It uses a structured integrative literature review organized through the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, and Analysis (SALSA) framework. The final analytical corpus consisted of 27 substantive sources, including journal articles, foundational and conceptual works, and policy or institutional documents selected for their relevance, transparency, contextual fit, and verifiability. The synthesis identifies five drivers of transformation, six recurring challenges, and eight interrelated management dimensions. Spiritual and ethical values form the framework’s normative foundation; value-grounded leadership, sustainable quality culture, and contextual internal quality assurance constitute its governance layer; and selective digitalization, human resource and digital competence development, curriculum integration, and strategic collaboration form its operational layer. The framework treats technology as wasilah (a means) for educational purposes rather than an end in itself. Because it is derived from an integrative review, the framework represents conceptual relationships rather than empirically established causal effects. Comparative empirical research is required before its effectiveness can be assessed across different pesantren contexts.