Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Scripta Economica: Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting
Salwa Salwa
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone
Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perbandingan Teori Keadilan dan Teori Stakeholder dalam Menilai Tanggung Jawab Sosial Syariah Islam Riri Sundari; Salwa Salwa; Masyhuri Masyhuri
Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Scripta Economica: Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/grh6k503

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of Justice Theory and Stakeholder Theory in assessing Islamic Sharia based social responsibility, particularly in the practices of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Islamic Social Reporting (ISR). The analysis is grounded in the conceptual divergence between a normative approach rooted in Islamic values of justice and an operational approach that prioritizes stakeholder interests. A qualitative method is employed through a comprehensive literature review of official Islamic banking reports, scholarly publications, and relevant prior studies. The findings indicate that Justice Theory emphasizes proportional distribution of benefits, vertical accountability to God, and the pursuit of maslahah as the fundamental objectives of Sharia-based economic activities, whereas Stakeholder Theory proves more adaptive in explaining corporate–stakeholder dynamics within modern business environments. However, the dominance of Stakeholder Theory without reinforcement of justice-based values risks reducing Islamic CSR to a mere instrument of legitimacy. Therefore, a synthesis of both theories is essential to construct a Sharia social responsibility framework that is equitable, operationally applicable, and sustainable.
Anomali Perlakuan Akuntansi atas Nilai Aset Budaya: Studi Kasus Goa Janji Kabupaten Bone Nurfadilah Rahmadani; Zaskia Asmiranda; Widia Natasya; Andi Devtriana Alya Nabila; Salwa Salwa; Muhammad Yamin
Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting Vol 2 No 1 (2026): July: Scripta Economica: Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/6ec0q262

Abstract

Heritage assets possess unique characteristics because they embody historical, cultural, and social values that cannot be fully represented through monetary-based accounting approaches. This study aims to analyze the anomaly in the accounting treatment of heritage asset values through a case study of Goa Janji in Bone Regency. The research employed a qualitative approach using a case study method. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that Goa Janji meets the characteristics of a heritage asset and qualifies for recognition as a government asset under the Government Accounting Standards because it is controlled by the local government and provides service potential to the public. However, an anomaly was identified in the measurement aspect due to the absence of historical cost, the lack of an active market, and the dominance of historical, cultural, and social identity values that cannot be measured reliably. The study concludes that the disclosure of heritage assets should be complemented by narrative information in the Notes to the Financial Statements to provide a more comprehensive representation of their cultural value.  
Co-Authors Andi Devtriana Alya Nabila masyhuri masyhuri Muhammad Yamin Nurfadilah Rahmadani Riri Sundari Widia Natasya Zaskia Asmiranda