Ach Saifullah
Universitas Islam Negri Madura

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Kesejahteraan Petani Tembakau Pamekasan dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Pembangunan Ach Saifullah; Asyari Asyari; Mahalli Andriyanto; Farahdilla kutsiyah
Ekonosfera: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Teknik Global Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/ekonosfera.v1i4.407

Abstract

The paradox of the development of the tobacco sector in Pamekasan Regency can be seen from the increase in planting area and productivity from 22.3 thousand hectares in 2023 to 31.1 thousand hectares in 2024 which is not directly proportional to the welfare of farmers. This study aims to analyze the structural and cultural roots that cause asynchrony between production growth and welfare improvement. Using qualitative methods with case study designs, data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations in four tobacco center villages, and document analysis. The data was analyzed thematically by combining the Agrarian Political Economy framework, Welfare Theory, and Sustainable Livelihood Framework (SLF). The results of the study show that inequality in the political economy structure including the dominance of middlemen, weak bargaining positions of farmers, ineffective allocation of DBHCHT, and distortion of access to production inputs are the main causes of welfare stagnation. In addition, local cultural factors create a cultural lock-in that reinforces farmers' systemic dependence on traditional marketing networks. These findings indicate the need for policy reforms that are transformative, targeted, and sensitive to socio-cultural dynamics in order to improve the welfare of tobacco farmers in a sustainable manner.
Klausul Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Dasar Penolakan Sengketa di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan Ach Saifullah
Ekonosfera: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Teknik Global Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Yayasan Cendekia Gagayunan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63142/ekonosfera.v2i1.454

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the basis for the rejection of the dispute by the Pamekasan Religious Court due to the existence of a sharia arbitration clause in Decision Number 1321/Pdt.G/2017/P.A. Pmk. The problems studied in this study include the position of the sharia arbitration clause in sharia economic disputes, the absolute authority of the Religious Court and its limits, and the judge's legal considerations in rejecting the lawsuit. This study uses qualitative research methods with a normative juridical approach and a case approach. Data was obtained through literature studies by examining laws and regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The results of the study show that the sharia arbitration clause has binding force as a valid arbitration agreement, thus causing legal consequences in the form of transferring the dispute resolution forum from the Religious Court to the sharia arbitration institution. The absolute authority of the Religious Court in sharia economic disputes is not absolute if the parties have agreed on the sharia arbitration clause in the contract. The judge's legal considerations in the judgment under review show the application of the provisions of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution as well as the principle of pacta sunt servanda as the basis for rejecting the dispute. This study concludes that the rejection of the dispute provides legal certainty, but also requires an adequate understanding from the parties regarding the legal consequences of the sharia arbitration clause to ensure legal protection and substantive justice.