Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Abigail Angeline Yap
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Digital Framing as an Unlawful Act in the Dispute Between Yai Min and Sahara Irene Puteri A. S. Sinaga; Abigail Angeline Yap; Sandriani Garanta; Valonia Nevada
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v9i1.52757

Abstract

This research analyzes the application of the elements of unlawful acts (Perbuatan melawan hukum or PMH) in defamation disputes arising from digital media under Indonesian civil law, using the case between Imam Muslimin (Yai Min) and Nurul Sahara as a contextual reference. In contrast to previous studies, this research provides an integrative perspective that bridges criminal and civil approaches to defamation, aiming to demonstrate how the elements of unlawful acts, namely fault, loss, causal relationship, and violation of rights are applied in assessing online defamation within the framework of civil liability. This study employs a normative legal research method with a case approach as the primary analytical framework. The analysis focuses on the implementation of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata or KUH Perdata) concerning unlawful acts, in conjunction with relevant provisions of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law). The sources of legal materials consist of primary materials (statutory regulations), secondary materials (legal doctrines, journals, and scholarly articles), and tertiary materials (credible media reports and supporting information). Data are collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively to evaluate the coherence between positive legal norms and their practical application in the Yai Min–Sahara case. The findings indicate that Sahara’s actions satisfy the elements of an unlawful act, particularly in the form of defamation, thereby highlighting the importance of responsible digital behavior and strengthening legal awareness regarding online communication ethics and liability.
Penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Kejahatan Dunia Maya Terhadap Manipulasi Konten Asusila Aurelia Gisa Maharani; Abigail Angeline Yap; Rafirstka Madyah Putri; Valonia Nevada
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v5i1.1738

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has brought significant changes to various aspects of human life, including the production and distribution of digital content. However, alongside these advancements, new opportunities for cybercrime have also emerged, particularly concerning the misuse of AI in the manipulation of obscene content. Phenomena such as deepfake pornography, AI-based image and video fabrication, and the dissemination of manipulative content without the victim’s consent demonstrate increasingly complex and difficult-to-detect forms of cybercrime. This study aims to analyze the forms of AI misuse in cybercrime related to the manipulation of obscene content, as well as to examine the application of law and the challenges of law enforcement within the Indonesian legal system through concrete case studies occurring in society. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Criminal Code, and regulations related to personal data protection and public morality. The findings indicate that although the existing positive legal framework regulates the prohibition of distributing obscene content, legal provisions addressing the misuse of AI remain implicit and have not specifically accommodated the distinctive characteristics of AI technology. Therefore, strengthening regulatory frameworks and adjusting criminal law policies are necessary to effectively respond to the rapid development of AI technology and to ensure optimal legal protection for victims of cybercrime involving obscene content manipulation.
Co-Authors Aurelia Gisa Maharani Irene Puteri A. S. Sinaga Rafirstka Madyah Putri Sandriani Garanta Valonia Nevada