Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Multi-Criteria Hypervisor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process with Ex-Post Evaluation Ronaldo Agung Nugroho; Dana Indra Sensuse; Sofian Lusa
MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Bumigora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30812/matrik.v15i2.6062

Abstract

reassessment of virtualization platform selection in banking Information Technology environments. The objective of this study is to develop a structured, scalable decision-making model to determine the most appropriate hypervisor platform based on technical and non-technical criteria. The research method used is the Analytic Hierarchy Process, developed from qualitative coding of expert interview results and validated through pairwise comparisons by internal infrastructure specialists. The analysis includes consistency measurements, sensitivity analyses, and an ex-post evaluation by comparing analytical ranking results with actual organizational decisions. The results show that technical criteria dominate the decision process, accounting for 64.10% of the total decision weight. At the alternative level, the final priority weights are 45.40–45.44% for Alternative 1, 38.00% for Alternative 2, and 16.55–16.60% for Alternative 3, with Alternative 1 identified as the most optimal choice. Notably, the proposed model achieves a 100% alignment between the analytical ranking and the actual organizational decision, representing a substantial improvement over prior studies, which were largely confined to ex-ante evaluations and lacked empirical validation of decision outcomes. The conclusion of this study confirms that integrating ex-post evaluation into a multi-criteria decision analysis approach enhances the validity of the results and demonstrates a strong fit between the analytical model and real-world decision-making in the context of banking information technology infrastructure.
Trends, Frameworks, and Reference Models in Public Sector Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Review Amanda Ghaisani; Dencaswo Purnomo; Dana Indra Sensuse; Sofian Lusa; Nurcholis Ramlan
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i4.2105

Abstract

Global Trends and Reference Models in Public Sector Enterprise Architecture: A Systematic Review” examines enterprise architecture implementation in the public sector across countries. Enterprise architecture is increasingly used as a strategic instrument to support digital transformation and interoperability, yet existing studies remain fragmented and lack cross-country synthesis. This study aims to identify global trends, reference models, best practices, and challenges in public sector enterprise architecture implementation. The method used is a systematic literature review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol, analyzing 23 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025. The results show that The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) is the most frequently adopted framework and often becomes the basis for localized national models. This study identifies 15 reference models classified into national-level, domain-specific, regional government, and organizational agile models. Successful implementation is influenced by government commitment, inter-agency collaboration, and alignment with digital transformation strategies. The study concludes that enterprise architecture plays both strategic and technical roles in strengthening public governance. For public sector policymakers, the findings indicate that EA initiatives should be supported by clear governance mandates, cross-agency coordination mechanisms, and contextual adaptation of global frameworks to national priorities and institutional capacity.