Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Digital Literacy in Islamic Education: An Integrative Multidisciplinary Strategy to Counter Radicalism and Disinformation on Social Media Muhammad Ainur Rohim; M. Yunus Abu Bakar; Ali Mas’ud
Journal of Science and Education (JSE) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Science and Education (JSE)
Publisher : CV. Media Digital Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58905/jse.v6i2.725

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital information has created a paradox within contemporary Islamic education. On one hand, social media serves as an effective medium for da'wah; on the other, it has become a channel for disseminating radical ideologies and religious disinformation that threaten the sustainability of religious moderation in Indonesia. This study aims to describe an integrative multidisciplinary strategic model for countering radicalism and disinformation on social media. Employing a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design, data were collected through social media content analysis, in-depth interviews with Islamic education teachers, and participatory observations conducted in several pesantren across East Java. Thematic analysis was carried out with the assistance of qualitative data analysis software. The findings reveal five central components: the anatomy of digital radicalism and disinformation; the Framework of Islamic Learning and Technology for Ethical Reasoning; the integration of technological, narrative, and operational dimensions; the development and contextual validation of the FILTER prototype model; and the recontextualization of Islamic epistemology in the digital era. First, the vulnerability of young generations to radical content is shaped by weak critical thinking skills and fragmented religious understanding. Second, the integration of hadith studies, ushul fiqh, cognitive psychology, and digital communication proves effective in strengthening ideological resilience. Third, the FILTER model demonstrates its potential to enhance students’ ability to identify and reject problematic content during limited trials. Therefore, these findings affirm that multidisciplinary digital literacy strategies not only enhance learners’ technological competence but also reinforce ideological immunity against the growing waves of radicalism and disinformation. The implementation of the FILTER model further represents a new form of digital sanad an adaptive knowledge chain responsive to contemporary scholarly dynamics and technological developments.
The Ecological Veto in Islamic Law: Reconstructing Natural Resource Governance from Prophetic Precedents Muhammad Zainuddin Zidan; Ali Mas’ud
Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 26 No. 1 (2026): Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman (In Press)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kerinci, Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/ff3b7n85

Abstract

Extractive industrial practices increasingly exacerbate global socio-ecological degradation, revealing the structural limitations of conventional market-driven governance and economic cost-benefit models in internalizing environmental damage. While contemporary environmental literature offers technocratic frameworks, existing Islamic legal scholarship remains divided between abstract eco-theological norms that lack operational legal enforceability and secular administrative regimes that bypass religious jurisprudence. To address this gap, this study examines the historical-normative precedents of early Islamic natural resource statecraft as its primary object of analysis. Employing a qualitative historical-normative design, this research utilizes uṣūlī hermeneutical methods, specifically takhrīj al-manāṭ (extraction of legal ratio legis), and the analytical framework of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah to evaluate canonical Hadith records regarding the revocation of Abyad bin Hammal’s salt mining concession and the institutionalization of the ḥimā Al-Naqī conservation zone. The findings demonstrate that early Islamic jurisprudence establishes an operational "ecological veto" mechanism: natural resource concessions operate not as perpetual private property rights, but as conditional public trusts (amānah) subject to mandatory revocation if they compromise ecological equilibrium or public access. Theoretically, this study reorients ḥifẓ al-māl from monetary asset accumulation to the preservation of natural capital. Practically, it proposes actionable regulatory reforms for modern mining policies, including non-automatic permit renewals, strict liability through upfront ecological bonds (al-kharāj bi al-ḍamān), and binding mining moratoriums in critical ecosystems. Ultimately, this research confirms that Islamic legal precedents offer a binding constitutional framework capable of constraining market externalities