Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Sharia (JOSH) DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Hisbullah Hisbullah
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A BRIEF REVIEW OF SIYASAH SYAR'IYYAH’S PRINCIPLES ON REASONS FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SINJAI REGENT REGULATION NUMBER 60 OF 2023 CONCERNING THE PARTICIPATION OF VILLAGE HEADS AND VILLAGE OFFICIALS IN THE BPJS HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM Nurazizah Nurazizah; Andi Muh. Taqiyuddin BN; Hisbullah Hisbullah; Mustaufiq Mustaufiq; Bariek Ramdhani Pababbari
JOSH: Journal of Sharia Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Vol. 05 No. 01 Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/josh.v5i01.2652

Abstract

This study aims to discuss a brief review based on the principles of syar'iyyah politics regarding the reasons for the amendment to Sinjai Regent Regulation Number 60 of 2023 concerning BPJS Health membership for village heads and village officials. This study is a qualitative study. The research design is field research. The supporting informants in this study consisted of the Head, Secretary, and Staff of Bonto Village, Sinjai Tengah District, Sinjai Regency, the Head of the Village Administration Division of the Sinjai Regency Community and Village Empowerment Office, and the Head of the Legal and Human Rights Division of the Sinjai Regency Secretariat. The results of this study show that the legal, philosophical, and sociological reasons for the amendment of Sinjai Regent Regulation No. 19 of 2021 to No. 60 of 2023 are in line with the principles of siyasah syar'iyyah. Among the reasons considered to be in line with these principles is the simplification of administration, which previously caused difficulties for village officials and even resulted in delays in the payment of BPJS Health contributions for village officials, ultimately leading to some village officials not receiving health services from BPJS.  However, the implications of this regulation still show inconsistencies with the principles of Siyasah Syar'iyyah. For example, there is a discrepancy with the principle of public interest, because if one village is late in uploading data, other villages are also affected, namely the system immediately experiences congestion. Health services for all village officials are also hampered. This also shows a discrepancy with the principle of justice, because there is unfair treatment of village officials who upload data on time.  
Transformation of Siyāsah Shar’iyyah: An Islamic Political Ethical Framework for Mitigating the Pathologies of Digital Power Hisbullah Hisbullah; Abdul Syatar; Mowafg Masuwd
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16613

Abstract

Background:  The ongoing digital transformation in global political governance has exacerbated systemic vulnerabilities, including algorithmic manipulation, information asymmetry, and data opacity, which fundamentally challenge the efficacy of conventional public accountability mechanisms and the moral integrity of state officials. Although discourse on Islamic political ethics has expanded significantly, contemporary literature remains confined within theological-moralistic generalizations and often falls short of formulating technical-specific solutions to the complexities of digital disruption that mainstream secular governance theories have yet to address exhaustively. Purpose:   this research analyzes how core Islamic ethical principles—such as justice (‘adl), trust (amānah), accountability (mas’ūliyyah), transparency (shafāfiyyah), and public welfare (maṣlaḥah)—function as binding moral-legal standards for public office. Methods:  This research fills this crucial gap by employing a normative qualitative approach that operationalizes Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah as the primary axiological framework to reformulate digital rights and obligations through the crystallization of the principles of Shafāfiyyah and Amānah within the domain of digital welfare (al-maslahah al-raqmiyyah) Results:   Research findings indicate that Islamic political ethics reconfigures public authority as a divinely witnessed mandate, wherein digital transparency is operationalized as a mandatory manifestation of spiritual and legal accountability or mas’ūliyyah to mitigate the abuse of discretion and structural corruption in cyberspace. Implication:  The study argues that Islamic political ethics offers an integrative governance model capable of addressing structural corruption and restoring public trust in state institutions within contemporary Muslim societies. Originality:  This study concludes that this integrative governance model offers an institutional restructuring framework capable of transforming individual moral values into digital codes of ethics and formal regulations, while simultaneously restoring public trust through the reinforcement of structural integrity in Muslim-majority countries during the digital era.  
Co-Authors Andi Muh. Taqiyuddin BN Bariek Ramdhani Pababbari Mowafg Masuwd Mustaufiq Mustaufiq Nurazizah Nurazizah Syatar, Abdul