Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT STRATEGIES THROUGH MEDIATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE IN LAND DISPUTE RESOLUTION Patih Ahmad Rafie; M. Martindo Merta; Junaidi Junaidi
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY SERVICE Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/jscs.v4i1.584

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of mediation technical guidance in land dispute resolution in Sirah Pulau Padang Sub-district, Ogan Komering Ilir Regency, South Sumatra Province. The research method used was technical guidance and interactive discussions, as well as mediation simulations involving participants from various backgrounds, such as Village Heads, Heads of Neighborhood Associations, Community Leaders, Babinsa, and community members. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and observations. The evaluation results showed that the mediation technical guidance program was effective in improving participants' understanding of land dispute resolution through mediation and sparked enthusiasm in disseminating information about land dispute resolution through mediation. In addition, the mediation simulation also helped participants in identifying problems in conflicts from various perspectives and increased participants' experience in finding alternative agreements between the parties. Therefore, mediation technical guidance can be effective in empowering communities to resolve land disputes and increase legal certainty in the land context.
Exoneration clauses in standard property agreements: between freedom of contract and consumer protection Junaidi Junaidi
Veteran Law Review Vol 9 No 1 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law |Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/velrev.v9i1.13907

Abstract

Standard agreements are commonly used in property sales to accelerate economic transactions, but they also raise important issues regarding the differing bargaining power of sellers and buyers. A major issue that arises is the use of liability exemption clauses, which protect developers rather than consumers. Taking into account the principles of fairness in contracts and the balance of rights and obligations, this study examines the legitimacy of such clauses in standard property agreements. Furthermore, the study aims to create a model agreement that strikes a balance between contractual freedom and consumer protection. A normative legal study was conducted through legislation, legal concepts, and comparative law. The results indicate that the evaluation of liability exemption clauses must be based on formal legal rules, as well as on substantive justice, transparent communication and balanced risk sharing between the parties involved. To prevent the abuse of standard provisions, the study recommends redesigning property agreements to incorporate fairness testing and consumer protection principles based on risk analysis. By providing a more flexible evaluation framework for common contract practices in the property sector, these findings will contribute to the development of contemporary contract law