Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area Ilomata International Journal of Social Science
Yermia Hendarwoto
Universitas Pertahanan Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Public Sentiment towards the Implementation of Pancasila Legal Philosophy in Indonesian International Diplomacy on Social Media Yermia Hendarwoto
JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political UMA) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jppuma.v13i2.15700

Abstract

This study evaluates Indonesian public perceptions of the application of Pancasila Legal Philosophy in international diplomacy through sentiment analysis on Twitter. Using text mining and machine learning algorithms—Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest—1,000 tweets containing keywords such as “Pancasila diplomacy,” “Indonesia at the UN,” and “Indonesian foreign policy” were collected and classified into positive, negative, and neutral categories. The distribution of sentiment indicates that 60% of tweets express positive perceptions, highlighting pride in Indonesia’s promotion of Pancasila values in global forums, 25% remain neutral, and 15% are negative, reflecting criticism of perceived inconsistencies between Pancasila and diplomatic practice. Model evaluation employed a confusion matrix and metrics of accuracy, precision, and recall across sentiment classes. Results demonstrate that Random Forest outperformed other models with 91% accuracy, stable precision, and recall across all classes. By comparison, SVM achieved 89% accuracy with consistent performance in high-dimensional text data, while Naïve Bayes recorded 85% accuracy but was less effective in handling class imbalance, particularly in neutral–negative distinctions. The Random Forest model explained the greatest variance in sentiment classification, confirming its strength in processing short and contextually complex texts such as tweets. Practically, these findings provide a foundation for developing a real-time sentiment monitoring system to support adaptive and participatory diplomacy. Integrating sentiment analysis into policy design enables the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to anticipate public responses, strengthen diplomacy narratives rooted in Pancasila values, and build a data-driven ecosystem for public diplomacy. This contributes to inclusive, ethical, and responsive foreign policy aligned with Indonesia’s state philosophy.
Thailand-Cambodia Conflict and Defense Diplomacy (2025–2026): Actors, Processes, and Conflict Management Oktaheroe Ramsi; Yermia Hendarwoto; Anak Agung Banyu Perwita
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): October 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i4.2774

Abstract

The Thailand-Cambodia conflict is a longstanding interstate conflict in Southeast Asia rooted in border disputes and competing territorial claims, particularly surrounding the Preah Vihear Temple. Although diplomatic mechanisms have been employed to manage the dispute, military tensions and the risk of renewed escalation have persisted, including the resurgence of armed clashes 2025. Against this background, defense diplomacy provides a non-coercive mechanism for managing military interactions and reducing escalation risks. This study examines how defense diplomacy operates as a conflict-management mechanism in the Thailand-Cambodia conflict by focusing on the actors involved, the security issues addressed, and the processes through which defense diplomacy contributes to de-escalation. The study employs a qualitative single-case study design. Data were collected through documentary analysis of official ASEAN, Thai, Cambodian, United Nations, and International Court of Justice documents, supported by peer-reviewed academic literature and credible media reports. Data were analyzed using an integrated analytical framework combining Neorealism and the security dilemma, Defense Diplomacy, Conflict Management, and Conflict Resolution. The findings indicate that defense diplomacy primarily functions as an instrument of conflict management rather than conflict resolution. Its contribution is reflected in maintaining military communication, supporting ceasefire implementation, regulating military activities, facilitating bilateral defense coordination, and supporting monitoring mechanisms. ASEAN provides a complementary regional role through diplomatic facilitation and ceasefire-related monitoring, while the underlying territorial dispute remains subject to longer-term political and diplomatic processes. The study demonstrates how defense-diplomatic practices help manage security-dilemma pressures and regulate military interaction and tensions across successive stages of the 2025–2026 conflict.
Co-Authors Anak Agung Banyu Perwita Oktaheroe Ramsi