Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang
Margareta P. E. Djokaho
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Nusa Cendana
Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEMAMPUAN MENYIMAK SISWA KELAS XI TET 1 SMK NEGERI 5 KUPANG DALAM MENGANALISIS TEKS BERITA AUDIOVISUAL Minrayati Adu; Labu Djuli; Margareta P. E. Djokaho
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 03 (2026): Volume 12 No. 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.18250

Abstract

The focus of this study is the listening comprehension skills of class XI TET 1 students at SMK Negeri 5 Kupang in analyzing audiovisual news texts. Listening comprehension is a fundamental foundation in language learning that frequently faces challenges related to student focus and retention. Therefore, this study aims to describe the listening skills of class XI TET 1 students at SMK Negeri 5 Kupang in analyzing audiovisual news texts. Audiovisual media was utilized to attract students' interest and provide a more concrete and contextual learning experience, as students not only hear information but also observe the context and expressions supporting the message's meaning. This research employed a descriptive qualitative method, underpinned by Information Processing Theory and Writing Theory. Based on the data analysis regarding the students' listening ability in analyzing audiovisual news texts, the results across the elements (5W+1H) aspect revealed that 2 students (9%) achieved the "very good" category, 13 students (59%) were in the "good" category, and 7 students (31%) fell into the "fairly good" category. In the news text structure aspect, 6 students (27%) reached the "very good" category, 10 students (45%) achieved "good", 4 students (18%) were categorized as "fairly good", and 2 students (9%) fell into the "poor" category. In terms of linguistic features, 9 students (40%) scored "very good", 11 students (50%) scored "good", 1 student (4%) scored "fairly good", and 1 student (4%) scored "poor". Overall, out of the 22 students studied, 4 students (18.18%) were categorized as very good, 4 students (18.18%) as good, 7 students (31.81%) as fairly good, and 7 students (31.81%) as poor in listening to and analyzing audiovisual news texts. Collectively, these findings indicate that the listening skills of class XI TET 1 students at SMK Negeri 5 Kupang in analyzing audiovisual news texts are generally categorized as good and have successfully surpassed the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKM) set at 75. The implementation of audiovisual media proved highly effective in assisting students to enhance deep comprehension and strengthen memory retention when examining news text components. Based on these conclusions, the researcher presents several strategic recommendations for instructional practice. Indonesian language teachers are expected to optimize and integrate varied audiovisual learning media based on current issues relevant to students' lives. Furthermore, teachers are advised to provide targeted exercises to reinforce critical reasoning, particularly in analyzing structural components and linguistic features with higher complexity. Thus, the quality of listening instruction can be continuously and equitably improved for all students.
KEMAMPUAN BERBICARA SISWA KELAS XI A SMAN 10 KUPANG MENYAMPAIKAN ARGUMEN DALAM KELAS MELALUI PENERAPAN METODE DEBAT Yulvin Fu’a; Labu Djuli; Margareta P. E. Djokaho
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 03 (2026): Volume 12 No. 03, September 2026 Published
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.18251

Abstract

This study focuses on analyzing and describing in detail the speaking ability of eleventh-grade students at SMA Negeri 10 Kupang, specifically in the context of presenting arguments in the classroom through the implementation of the debate method. Speaking skills, particularly in arguing, represent an essential competence that students must master in modern language learning. The selection of the debate method as the primary learning instrument is based on its proven effectiveness in creating a dynamic, communicative, and interactive learning atmosphere. Through the debate mechanism, students are not only required to speak up bravely when expressing opinions in public, but are also encouraged to sharpen their critical thinking skills, process supporting facts, and respond to opponents' ideas with logical and structured rebuttals. Methodologically, this study applies a descriptive qualitative approach to provide an objective, comprehensive, and detailed overview of students' rhetorical performance and argument formulation in the classroom. The theoretical foundation underpinning this research combines two main pillars: speaking theory and cognitive learning theory. Integrating these two theories aims to map not only external linguistic aspects—such as fluency, grammar usage, and articulation—but also students' internal cognitive processes in constructing reasoning structures and scientific thinking frameworks when defending arguments before an audience. The data collection and comprehensive analysis were conducted on 25 students of Class XI A at SMA Negeri 10 Kupang based on seven measurable indicators of speaking skills. Empirical evaluation results revealed variations in students' speaking abilities across four main performance categories: Very Good (90–100): A total of 7 students (28%) achieved highly satisfying performance within this highest score range. Good (80–89): This group includes 5 students (20%) who demonstrated solid mastery of argumentation. Fair (75–79): There were 3 students (12%) whose scores fell right at or slightly above the passing threshold. Poor (<75): A total of 10 students (40%) remained in this category as they had not met the established qualification criteria. Overall, these findings conclude that the speaking ability of Class XI A students at SMA Negeri 10 Kupang in presenting arguments through the debate method can generally be categorized as good, with a learning mastery percentage reaching 60%. Nevertheless, the fact that 40% of the students have not reached the Minimum Mastery Criterion (MMC) of 75 highlights a real challenge in the learning process. This empirical evidence underscores the importance of continuous instructional evaluation, refined individual mentoring techniques, and the implementation of more inclusive teaching strategies so that all students can evenly optimize their oral communication potential and critical reasoning skills. Overall, these findings conclude that the speaking ability of Class XI A students at SMA Negeri 10 Kupang in presenting arguments through the debate method can generally be categorized as good, with a learning mastery percentage reaching 60%. Nevertheless, the fact that 40% of the students have not reached the Minimum Mastery Criterion (MMC) of 75 highlights a real challenge in the learning process. This empirical evidence underscores the importance of continuous instructional evaluation, refined individual mentoring techniques, and the implementation of more inclusive teaching strategies so that all students can evenly optimize their oral communication potential and critical reasoning skills.
Co-Authors Labu Djuli Minrayati Adu Yulvin Fu’a