Suparwi Suparwi
Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Judicial Scrutiny of Indonesian Migrant Worker Placement Under the Guise of Training Fabrian Candra Darmawan; Hafid Zakariya; Suparwi Suparwi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i1.458

Abstract

The widespread placement of Indonesian Migrant Workers (Pekerja Migran Indonesia [PMI]) through unauthorized Job Training Institutions (Lembaga Pelatihan Kerja [LPK]) reflects continuing weaknesses in the oversight of non-procedural labor migration, increasing the risk of exploitation, human trafficking, and human rights violations. This study analyzes the judicial application of law in assessing the constituent elements of the criminal offense of migrant worker placement through unlicensed LPKs, as reflected in Boyolali District Court Decision Number 158/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Byl, while evaluating the effectiveness of judicial reasoning in protecting victims. Using a normative legal method with statutory, case-based, and conceptual approaches, the study finds that the panel of judges appropriately distinguished the authority of LPKs and Perusahaan Penempatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia (P3MI) based on SIP2MI ownership and affirmed the defendant’s criminal liability. However, victim restoration mechanisms remain inadequate, particularly regarding restitution and rehabilitation.
Aligning Recovery and Legal Certainty in Restorative Justice for Theft Offenses Faizal Tri Noviyanto; Hanuring Ayu Ardhani Putri; Suparwi Suparwi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v8i1.486

Abstract

The paradigm shift in Indonesian criminal law following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code has strengthened the restorative justice approach in resolving theft offenses by emphasizing restoration rather than punishment. This study aims to analyze legal protection and legal certainty in the implementation of restorative justice for theft offenses under the new Criminal Code. The research employed a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches and was analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that restorative justice provides more comprehensive protection for victims, offenders, and society through compensation for losses, offender accountability, and the restoration of social relationships. Nevertheless, legal certainty continues to face challenges arising from regulatory fragmentation and differing interpretations among law enforcement authorities. This study concludes that regulatory harmonization and the strengthening of implementation mechanisms are essential to achieving a fair, humane, and restorative criminal justice system.