Princess Alyssa D. Tee-Anastacio
Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela Campus, Philippines

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

From Employment Quotas to Enforceable Inclusion: Comparing Disability Employment Governance in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Germany Benedicta Mary Tiara Florensia Patient Sudin; Muh. Ali Masnun; Wira Satya Nugraha Wicaksono; Princess Alyssa D. Tee-Anastacio
RechtIdee Vol 21, No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v21i1.32323

Abstract

Study Objective: This study analyzes the legal certainty for workers with disabilities in Indonesia based on the Law on Persons with Disabilities and compares the legal and policy approaches implemented by three countries for workers with disabilities.Methods/Approach: This study employed a normative legal research method, employing statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches, supported by primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and non-legal materials collected through desk research and analyzed using prescriptive analysis.Novelty: This study focuses on the Indonesian legal framework, which does not provide legal certainty for workers with disabilities because there are no sanctions against companies that fail to fulfill their obligations to provide employment opportunities for people with disabilities.Findings: Indonesia does not yet have binding regulations on companies that fail to provide employment opportunities for workers with disabilities. The Philippines has provided tax incentives for companies that recruit workers with disabilities. In contrast, Germany has the strongest legal system, imposing fines on companies that do not employ workers with disabilities.Conclusion: Indonesia needs to immediately enact strict, binding implementing regulations to create optimal employment opportunities for workers with disabilities.
ASSESSING TRADITIONAL MEDICINE, HEALTH LAW, AND GLOBALIZATION IN INDONESIA: TOWARD ACCOUNTABILITY AND SAFEGUARDS Tengku Keizerina Devi Azwar; Princess Alyssa D. Tee-Anastacio
KANUN:JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 27 No. 3: December 2025: Law and Justice in the Era of Digital Transformation
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kjih.v27i3.134

Abstract

Traditional medicine, as part of Indonesia’s healthcare system, is a form of treatment distinct from modern medicine that aims to complement technological advances. This article analyzes changes in health law amid globalization and its relationship to traditional medicine within Indonesia’s legal framework, focusing on Law Number 17 of 2023 and its derivative instruments. This normative legal study emphasizes conceptual and legislative approaches. The findings indicate that regulation of traditional medicine as part of the globalizing health system has been addressed through the Health Law and Government Regulation on Traditional Health Services. However, legal certainty regarding the liability of traditional medicine and the protection of patient rights remains insufficient. Therefore, strengthening regulations, improving supervision, enhancing public education, and establishing a responsive dispute-resolution system are essential to protect patients while ensuring the continuity of traditional medicine. The regulation of traditional medicine in Indonesia possesses specific characteristics that may require special regulations or affirmative action to address liability for errors or shortcomings within the Health Law and related regulations. Consequently, it is necessary to bolster derivative regulations, intensify supervision, expand public education, and implement a responsive dispute-resolution framework to safeguard patients and sustain traditional medicine in the era of globalization. Revising the Health Law and related regulations to reflect the scientific development of traditional medicine and to ensure accountability for medical negligence, surveillance, and patient rights is a strategic step toward clearly delineating accountability mechanisms, operational standards, and patient-protection guarantees.