Aprila Niravita
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Harmonization and Implementation Challenges of the ASEAN Agreement on Electronic Commerce: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Malaysia Aprila Niravita; Ayup Suran Ningsih; Hazlina Binti Shaik MD Noor Alam; Faizin Sulistio; Harumsari Puspa Wardhani
International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ildisea.v5i1.40788

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-commerce in Southeast Asia has intensified the need for a harmonized legal framework to ensure legal certainty, protect consumers, and facilitate cross-border digital trade. This issue is closely aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8 on promoting sustainable economic growth through digital trade and SDG 16 on strengthening effective legal institutions and access to justice, while also supporting digital innovation under SDG 9. In response, ASEAN adopted the ASEAN Agreement on Electronic Commerce (AAEC) as a regional instrument to advance digital economic integration among its member states. This study examines the harmonization and implementation of AAEC provisions in Indonesia and Malaysia and identifies the challenges affecting their effective application. Employing a comparative juridical approach, the research analyzes national regulations governing electronic commerce and digital trade, supported by policy documents, official reports, and relevant empirical studies. The novelty of this research lies in evaluating both the conformity of domestic regulations with AAEC provisions and the practical implementation challenges influencing regional legal harmonization. The findings demonstrate that both countries have incorporated the core principles of the AAEC into their domestic legal frameworks, particularly regarding recognition of electronic transactions, consumer protection, and personal data governance. Nevertheless, substantial differences remain in regulatory readiness, institutional coordination, enforcement capacity, digital infrastructure, and the preparedness of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). Malaysia exhibits stronger institutional readiness and regulatory consistency, whereas Indonesia continues to face regulatory fragmentation and uneven implementation across sectors. The study concludes that effective AAEC implementation depends not only on harmonized legal norms but also on robust institutions, coordinated enforcement, and inclusive digital capacity-building. These findings contribute to the development of regional digital trade governance by providing policy recommendations to strengthen legal harmonization, institutional cooperation, and digital inclusion, thereby supporting ASEAN's digital economic integration.
Digital Transformation With the Impact of AI in Government Decision Making Firman Freaddy Busroh; Fatria Khairo; Aprila Niravita; Bhanu Prakash Nunna
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): October, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i4.30339

Abstract

This abstract reviews digital transformation in the context of government decision making with respect to the impact produced by AI and the implications for constitutional law. Digital transformation has become the main driver in the industrial revolution that has swept across various sectors, including the government. The presence of AI in the governmental decision-making process provides an increase in efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness in answering the complexity of the problems faced. However, the presence of AI in government decision making raises a number of legal questions that need to be taken into account. These issues are related to transparency, accountability, privacy, and fairness in applying the AI technology by the government. In the context of constitutional law, adjustments and improvements of regulations need to be made to accommodate the new dynamics introduced by digital transformation with the existence of AI. Therefore, it is important to undertake efforts to understand and predict the impact of AI in decision making by the government and its implications on constitutional law to direct the development of inclusive and sustainable public policy in this digital era.