Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Oddie Bagus Saputra
Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Hegemonic Identity and State Interests in the United States’ TikTok Ban Policy (2020) Oddie Bagus Saputra; Hla Moe Tara Hlaing
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta (IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v23i1.501

Abstract

This article examines the United States’ TikTok ban policy in 2020 by analyzing the relationship between hegemonic identity, state interests, and foreign policy actions. Drawing upon a constructivist perspective, the study argues that the policy should not be understood solely as a technocratic response to cybersecurity concerns, but rather as part of a broader effort to preserve the United States’ dominant position within the global technological order. The United States’ identity as the hegemonic power shaped the construction of strategic interests related to cybersecurity, digital sovereignty, and platform competition, which were subsequently translated into the restrictive policy measures targeting TikTok as the Chinese-owned platform. Using a qualitative case study approach, this article analyzes policy documents, official government statements, and relevant academic literature concerning digital politics and US–China technological rivalry. The findings demonstrate that the TikTok ban reflected broader geopolitical anxieties regarding China’s technological rise and the shifting balance of power within the global digital economy. This article contributes to International Relations scholarship by highlighting the role of identity in shaping foreign policy behavior in the context of digital capitalism and technological competition.
Perbedaan Kebijakan Indonesia dan Vietnam di Tengah Kompetisi Vaksin Cina dan Amerika Serikat di Era Pandemi Covid-19 Oddie Bagus Saputra
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Yayasan Kampus Tercinta-Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v21i1.307

Abstract

Tulisan ini berusaha untuk menjelaskan faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya diferensiasi kebijakan antara Vietnam dan Indonesia dalam merespons kompetisi vaksin Cina dan Amerika Serikat. Konsep foreign policy decision making (FPDM) dari Alex Mintz dan Karl DeRouen Jr digunakan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memotivasi Vietnam maupun Indonesia untuk menerapkan kebijakan (balancing maupun bandwagoning). Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah  studi kasus pada dua negara di kawasan Asia Tenggara yakni Vietnam dan Indonesia. Analisi ini menemukan bahwa Vietnam menerapkan kebijakan balancing dipengaruhi oleh pengalaman dalam memproduksi vaksin penyakit sebelumnya, advisory group (special working group Kemenkes, pengusaha, dan pengembang vaksin); ketidakpercayaan masyarakat Vietnam terhadap vaksin Cina dan kecurigaan terhadap isu Laut Cina Selatan; pemulihan status sebagai emerging middle power. Sementara itu, kebijakan bandwagoning Indonesia terkonstruksi oleh keterbatasan informasi dan waktu, advisory group (Menlu Retno Marsudi dan Presiden Joko Widodo), opini publik mengenai program vaksinasi, kepentingan ekonomi, vaccine nationalism, dan keterlambatan distribusi vaksin AstraZeneca.  
Co-Authors Hla Moe Tara Hlaing