Renda Aranggraeni
Universitas Dr.Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Criminal Liability of Police Officers for Assault Resulting in Death: The Bripda Mesias Case in Tual City Abdul Munim; Noenik Soekorini; Renda Aranggraeni
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v6i1.6809

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the criminal liability of police officers for assault resulting in death through the 2026 case of Police Brigadier Mesias in Tual City. It examines applicable criminal law provisions, law enforcement mechanisms, and judicial processes, while proposing reforms to strengthen police accountability in Indonesia.Research Methodology: The study employed a normative-empirical legal approach using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative analyses. Data were collected through interviews, observations, document reviews, and literature studies, then analyzed using juridical, content, and thematic techniques with triangulation to ensure validity.Results: The findings show that all elements of Article 351(3) of the Indonesian Criminal Code were fulfilled. Police officers do not enjoy criminal immunity, and the defense of acting in an official capacity was rejected because the use of force violated the principles of necessity and proportionality. The court imposed a five-year prison sentence, considering both aggravating and mitigating factors.Conclusions: Accountability is hindered by limited independence in internal investigations, corps solidarity, sentencing disparities, and weak witness protection. Public and civil society pressure played a significant role in ensuring accountability. Institutional reforms are needed to strengthen transparency and independent oversight.Limitations: The study focuses on a single case, limiting broader generalization. Access to internal police documents was restricted.Contributions: The study advances scholarship on police accountability, provides a framework for dual accountability, and offers practical insights for legal reform and policymaking.
Sentencing Disparities for Small-Quantity Drug Users and Their Impact on Prison Overcrowding in Indonesia Shania Vira Aisyah; Noenik Soekorini; Renda Aranggraeni; Dudik Djaja Sidharta
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 5 No 2 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v5i2.6879

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes sentencing disparities in narcotics cases involving drug users possessing small quantities of narcotics in Indonesian courts and examines their contribution to prison overcrowding.Research Methodology: This research employs a normative legal research design applying statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. Data were collected through systematic analysis of statutory regulations, published court decisions, Supreme Court Circular Letters, and peer-reviewed legal literature.Results: The analysis reveals significant sentencing disparities in comparable narcotics user cases, with courts inconsistently imposing imprisonment, suspended sentences, or rehabilitation orders despite substantially similar factual circumstances. The dominance of custodial sentences directly contributes to prison overcrowding.Conclusions: Sentencing inconsistency reflects weak standardization in narcotics law enforcement and inadequate implementation of rehabilitation policies, producing systemic overcrowding in correctional institutions. Reformulating sentencing guidelines and strengthening rehabilitation mechanisms are essential steps toward a more proportionate and consistent criminal justice system.Limitations: The study is limited by restricted access to comprehensive published court decisions and the absence of nationwide empirical correctional data.Contributions: This research contributes to criminal law policy reform by proposing a normative framework for rehabilitation-oriented sentencing and reducing disparities in narcotics cases.