M.Yustino Aribawa
Universitas Dr.Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical Review of Prisoners' Conditional Rights After Law No. 22 of 2022 on Corrections: Eliminating Discrimination for Special-Crime Inmates Mahendra Setiadji; Syahrul Borman; M.Yustino Aribawa
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 5 No 2 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v5i2.6819

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the implementation of prisoners’ conditional rights following the enactment of Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections, particularly regarding the elimination of discriminatory treatment in granting remission, assimilation, and parole for prisoners convicted of special crimes.Research Methodology: This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Data were collected through a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and analyzed qualitatively.Result: The findings indicate that Law Number 22 of 2022 strengthens the principle of non-discrimination by providing equal opportunities for all prisoners to obtain conditional rights based on objective criteria, including behavior, participation in correctional programs, and risk assessment results. The policy reflects a shift from a punitive approach toward rehabilitation and social reintegration. Nevertheless, implementation challenges remain, including differing public perceptions, institutional limitations, and the need for regulatory harmonization. Conclusions: The law represents a significant reform in Indonesia’s correctional system by promoting equality before the law, human rights protection, and rehabilitation-oriented corrections. The elimination of discriminatory requirements supports fairer treatment of prisoners and contributes to the effectiveness of correctional administration.Limitations: This study is limited to a normative legal analysis and does not comprehensively examine empirical implementation across correctional institutions.Contributions: The study contributes to the development of correctional law scholarship and provides policy recommendations for strengthening a fair, humane, and rightsbased correctional system.
Civil Liability of Wedding Organizers toward Vendors and Customers for Acts of the Organizing Committee Karina Putri; Subekti Subekti; M.Yustino Aribawa
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 5 No 2 (2026): January
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jihham.v5i2.6843

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the forms and scope of the civil liability of wedding organizers toward third-party vendors and customers resulting from the actions of the organizing committee, and to develop a civil liability framework that provides legal certainty while ensuring balanced legal protection for all parties involved.Research Methodology: This study adopts a qualitative approach using a normative juridical research method. The analysis is based on an extensive literature review of statutory regulations and national and international scholarly publications published within the last five years, supplemented by illustrative scenarios drawn from publicly reported patterns of wedding organizer disputes, used solely to contextualize the legal analysis rather than as a formal empirical dataset.Results: The findings indicate that the civil liability of wedding organizers is primarily based on breach of contract, tort, and the principle of vicarious liability. Negligent acts committed by the organizing committee remain the responsibility of the wedding organizer insofar as they occur within the scope of their assigned duties. Financial transparency and effective internal governance constitute the primary preventive measures for minimizing the risk of legal disputes.Conclusions: Wedding organizers bear the primary contractual responsibility toward both customers and vendors. An ideal liability model should incorporate comprehensive contractual provisions, effective supervision, and an accountable financial management system.Limitations: This study is limited by its reliance on a normative legal approach and secondary data sources, without incorporating primary data obtained through direct interviews with the parties involved.Contributions: This study contributes theoretically to the development of the doctrine of vicarious liability in project-based service industries and provides practical contributions to the establishment of contractual standards for the wedding organizer industry.